2008
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-64402008000300010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytotoxicity evaluation of four endodontic sealers

Abstract: This study evaluated in vitro the cytotoxicity of four root canal sealers (Topseal, EndoRez, TubliSeal and Kerr Pulp Canal Sealer E.W.T.) and their effects on reactive oxygen/nitrogen intermediate induction by mouse peritoneal macrophages. Thioglycollate-induced cells were obtained from Swiss mice by peritoneal lavage with 5 mL 10 mM phosphate-buffered saline, washed twice and resuspended (10 6 cells/mL) in appropriate medium for each test. Cytotoxicity was determined by the presence of hydrogen peroxide (H 2 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(19 reference statements)
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings of the present study agree with several previous studies that showed that RoekoSeal was only little cytotoxic or completely non-cytotoxic even in fresh conditions 9,11,12,21 . The relatively severe and mild cytotoxic responses exhibited by the other sealers in fresh conditions, confirm the results reported in previous studies 2,7,9,11,12,18,22,23 . This could be attributed to the release of small amounts of toxic substances present in the sealers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The findings of the present study agree with several previous studies that showed that RoekoSeal was only little cytotoxic or completely non-cytotoxic even in fresh conditions 9,11,12,21 . The relatively severe and mild cytotoxic responses exhibited by the other sealers in fresh conditions, confirm the results reported in previous studies 2,7,9,11,12,18,22,23 . This could be attributed to the release of small amounts of toxic substances present in the sealers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Although in our daily life, the clinical application of eugenol is still limited to dentistry (Zinc oxide –eugenol fillings), it is important to note that the chemosensitivity of MCF-7 cells to eugenol occurs at lower concentrations than those previously reported (1–4 mM) in non-cancer cells6061 and those commonly used in dental practice15161741. Elucidation of the key players underlying the sensitivity to eugenol and mechanistic differences between normal and cancer cells to eugenol requires further in vivo and in vitro investigations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, despite the reported safety, concentration-dependent adverse side effects of eugenol have been noted111213. Reduced healing process, cytotoxicity and necrosis were observed in eugenol (0.1–1 mM) treated macrophages1415, human periodontal ligament cells16, osteoblasts17, and fibroblasts18.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 h later, non-adherent cells were discarded. The remaining adherent cells were maintained in culture for 24 h until they were used for experiments [53].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%