2006
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2006-04-014415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytotoxic T cells generated against heteroclitic peptides kill primary tumor cells independent of the binding affinity of the native tumor antigen peptide

Abstract: Heteroclitic peptide modifications increase immunogenicity, allowing generation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) against weakly immunogenic tumor-associated antigens (TAAs). A critical issue is whether T cells generated against heteroclitic peptides retain the ability to recognize and kill tumor cells expressing the original weak TAAs, and whether there is a lower threshold of binding affinity of the native peptides, below which such CTLs can still kill primary tumor cells. To examine this we used a model exa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, it has been reported that for generating effector CD8 ϩ T cells using heteroclitic peptides, the rate limiting step was the priming step and once the effector cells were generated, the binding affinity of the native peptide to MHC class I was not limiting in the capacity of these cells to perform effector functions. 27 The same study reported increased killing of targets expressing native peptides with FI equaling zero. FI of the native TEL-AML1 peptide equals 0.27 ( Figure 1C), which might explain its specific recognition by anchor-modified peptide primed CD8 ϩ T cells.…”
Section: An Anchor Modification Is Needed To Render the Described Telmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…On the other hand, it has been reported that for generating effector CD8 ϩ T cells using heteroclitic peptides, the rate limiting step was the priming step and once the effector cells were generated, the binding affinity of the native peptide to MHC class I was not limiting in the capacity of these cells to perform effector functions. 27 The same study reported increased killing of targets expressing native peptides with FI equaling zero. FI of the native TEL-AML1 peptide equals 0.27 ( Figure 1C), which might explain its specific recognition by anchor-modified peptide primed CD8 ϩ T cells.…”
Section: An Anchor Modification Is Needed To Render the Described Telmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…When these substitutions are made in residues that contact the TCR, the peptides are called "altered peptide ligands". Such peptides are of interest for use in anticancer vaccine development because they can strongly stimulate T-cells and therefore achieve more potent immune responses as compared with the native epitope [73][74][75]. They can act as superagonists and have been shown to break T-cell tolerance in a mouse viral hepatitis model [76], which might make them particularly useful for tumorspecific immune responses [77,78].…”
Section: Heteroclitic Analogsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Such peptides are of interest for use in anticancer vaccine development because they can strongly stimulate T-cells and therefore achieve more potent immune responses as compared with the native epitope [56,57]. They can act as superagonists and have been shown to break T-cell tolerance in a mouse viral hepatitis model [58].…”
Section: Improving Peptide Designmentioning
confidence: 98%