2011
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-12-325035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The only proposed T-cell epitope derived from the TEL-AML1 translocation is not naturally processed

Abstract: Adoptive therapy with T-cell receptor (TCR)-engineered T cells is a promising approach in cancer treatment. While usage of T cells specific for tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) can lead to serious side effects because of autoimmunity, targeting true tumor-specific mutations, such as the products of translocations in leukemias, should reduce such a risk. A potentially ideal target might be the chimeric protein TEL-AML1, which results from the chromosomal translocation 12;21 and represents the most common fusion… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(61 reference statements)
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, despite continuous claims of their immunogenicity, often analyzed by reverse immunology, firm evidence that T cells raised against shared TSAs reject tumors is lacking. For example, the TEL-AML chromosomal breakpoint region was claimed to generate an immunogenic HLA-A0201-resticted epitope (62), but subsequently, it was shown that it is not processed and presented (63). Thus, raising T cells against shared TSAs is difficult and likely possible only for a few HLA restriction molecules.…”
Section: Clinical-translational Advancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite continuous claims of their immunogenicity, often analyzed by reverse immunology, firm evidence that T cells raised against shared TSAs reject tumors is lacking. For example, the TEL-AML chromosomal breakpoint region was claimed to generate an immunogenic HLA-A0201-resticted epitope (62), but subsequently, it was shown that it is not processed and presented (63). Thus, raising T cells against shared TSAs is difficult and likely possible only for a few HLA restriction molecules.…”
Section: Clinical-translational Advancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it was not expected that the predicted HLA-A*0201 binding TEL-AML1 fusion peptide was not naturally generated by cells because of multiple proteasomal cleavage sites within the sequence of this fusion peptide. 1 Thus, the candidate peptide is probably not produced in useful amounts to serve as a target presented on MHC complexes on the surface of the acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells harboring this fusion protein.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Another important lesson to be learned from Popovic et al is that the relatively high affinity to the HLA-A*0201 molecule predicted by computer algorithms did not translate to biologic efficacy of either inducing T cells or serving as their targets. In fact, the peptide had to be anchored artificially to the MHC to accomplish these effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has the advantage of specifically screening for T cells that recognize MiHA exclusively expressed by hematopoietic cells. However, we and others have previously reported that when such peptide predictions are solely based on computer algorithms that predict peptide-HLA binding affinity and proteolytic cleavage, the vast majority of T cell responses detected are directed against epitopes that are not naturally processed and presented and, as a consequence, will not kill their target cells (25)(26)(27). The identification of the HLA-associated peptidome of hematopoietic cells by mass spectrometric analysis evades this peptide selection problem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%