1964
DOI: 10.1080/00087114.1964.10796120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytotaxonomic Studies in Apocynaceae and Delineation of the Different Evolutionary Tendencies Operating within the Family

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
1

Year Published

1978
1978
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This procedure is contrary to the one employed by some cytologists who dealt with Apocynaceae. Roy Tapadar and Sen (1960), Tapadar (I 964) and Banerjee (1974) distinguished differences in length of 0.1 ~am, but Datta and Maiti (1972) even registered differences as small as 0.01 #m. The accuracy pursued by these authors is of disputable value: the length of the chromosomes of A Ilamanda cathartiea rangesaccordingto RoyTapadar and Sen (1960) from 1.5 to 4.1 ~m, whereas the first author in a later publication (Roy Tapadar, 1964) mentions a range of 2.1 to 4.8 ~m for this species. Table 1 shows that the size of the somatic metaphase chromosomes of most of the species analysed in this study fall in a range of l to 2 #m. Longer chromosomes (l to 3 #m) occur in the tribe Tabernaemontaneae.…”
Section: Chromosome Length and Karyoope Morphologymentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This procedure is contrary to the one employed by some cytologists who dealt with Apocynaceae. Roy Tapadar and Sen (1960), Tapadar (I 964) and Banerjee (1974) distinguished differences in length of 0.1 ~am, but Datta and Maiti (1972) even registered differences as small as 0.01 #m. The accuracy pursued by these authors is of disputable value: the length of the chromosomes of A Ilamanda cathartiea rangesaccordingto RoyTapadar and Sen (1960) from 1.5 to 4.1 ~m, whereas the first author in a later publication (Roy Tapadar, 1964) mentions a range of 2.1 to 4.8 ~m for this species. Table 1 shows that the size of the somatic metaphase chromosomes of most of the species analysed in this study fall in a range of l to 2 #m. Longer chromosomes (l to 3 #m) occur in the tribe Tabernaemontaneae.…”
Section: Chromosome Length and Karyoope Morphologymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In order to reduce the size of the reference list, most references already included in other collective documents have been omitted in this paper. These documents are the publications of Roy Tapadar (1964), Fedorov (1969, Datta and Maiti (1972), R. J. Moore ( 1973Moore ( , 1974Moore ( , 1977 and Goldblatt (1981 and.…”
Section: Chromosome Numbers; Other Reports Andsvnonymsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…1). The previous reports revealed 22 somatic chromosomes in wild type T. coronaria (Roy Tapadar and Sen 1960, Roy Tapadar 1964, Dutta and Maity 1972. The chromosomes are mostly medium in size in three varieties ranging between 1.45 to 4.04 μm in length.…”
Section: Cytological Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chromosome complement of this species has been found to be homogeneous with 2n=22 and n=11 (Roy Tapadar and Sen 1960, Roy Tapadar 1964, Dutta and Maity 1972 except one report by Van der Laan and Arends (1985), where they found 2n=33 chromosomes. The different species of this genus contain 2n=22 chromosomes revealing basic number to be x=11 (Van der Laan and Arends 1985).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chromosomal analysis has been viewed as an important tool for establishing variability but owing to difficulty in the study of chromosomes of tree species, no attention has been paid so far in this genus. Although there are reports on the chromosome counts (Gajapathy 1962, Raman and Kesavan 1963, Tapadar and Roy 1964, Mehra and Bawa 1969) of these species but no studies have been carried out on chromosome complements. Thus the present investigation was undertaken with an aim to carry out cytogenetic analyses of these 2 important tree species of Aravallis in Rajasthan, in order to gain valuable information on genetic basis of interspecific variations in the genus Wrightia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%