2016
DOI: 10.1508/cytologia.81.195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytological Study of Tetraploid Species of <i>Magnolia</i> subgenus <i>Yulania</i> (Magnoliaceae)

Abstract: Summary Cytological studies were conducted on five tetraploid species plus two varieties of Magnolia subgenus Yulania and a hybrid between two of these species. Two different chromosome configurations in meiosis are observed in this article. The first group was typical for M. acuminata, M. liliiflora and their relatives which share several cytological characteristics including chromosome configurations and behavior in meiosis. The cytological evidence indicate autotetraploid origin for these species, despite t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, molecular data are heritable and stable. With the development of molecular biology, molecular biology tools such as Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP), Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD), Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) and chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) sequencing have become more and more important in the systematics of Magnoliaceae [29][30][31]. While validating many anatomical and morphological views, many phylogenetic trees have been proposed that are very different from morphological taxonomy, making us question some traditional taxonomic bases [32][33][34].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, molecular data are heritable and stable. With the development of molecular biology, molecular biology tools such as Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP), Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD), Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) and chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) sequencing have become more and more important in the systematics of Magnoliaceae [29][30][31]. While validating many anatomical and morphological views, many phylogenetic trees have been proposed that are very different from morphological taxonomy, making us question some traditional taxonomic bases [32][33][34].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%