2016
DOI: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20161424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytohistopathological correlation of Papanicolaou smears: a hospital based study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
7
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
7
4
Order By: Relevance
“…On Pap smears 2 cases and 4 cases were diagnosed as adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma respectively which showed 100% correlation on histopathology. In our study, the overall accuracy in our study was comparable to Atla et al 11 (83.33%), Patil et al 15 (82.1%) and Joshi et al 8 (80.0%) ( Table 4). This study shows a good correlation between Pap smear and cervical histology.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…On Pap smears 2 cases and 4 cases were diagnosed as adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma respectively which showed 100% correlation on histopathology. In our study, the overall accuracy in our study was comparable to Atla et al 11 (83.33%), Patil et al 15 (82.1%) and Joshi et al 8 (80.0%) ( Table 4). This study shows a good correlation between Pap smear and cervical histology.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…8 The present study included 154 pap smear cases who also undergone biopsy or hysterectomy with most patients (35%) in the age group of 41-50 yrs and belong to para 2 (42%) followed by para 3 (25.6%). It has accordance with Sachan et al, 8 and Parija et al 9 The maximum number of patients presented with complaints of whitish discharge per vaginum (42%) and pain lower abdomen (35%) correlates with the study conducted by Bamanikar et al, 10 Atla et al, 11 and Bindroo et al 12 In our study out of 116 cases of NILM, 99% of cases correlated on histopathology which corroborated with the studies done by Atla et al, 11 and Bindroo et al 12 The incidence of Epithelial cell abnormality (ECA) was seen in 18.1% which correlated with Patil et al 13 But this incidence was higher than the study conducted by Malpani et al, 14 this may be because we had small sample size.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Though false negative rates are usually misjudged when using follow up controls, our value observation against immediate histologic 'gold-standard' reflects an effective screening program for cervical cancer. 13 In our study, the overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of pap smear was 90.57%, 62.50%, 95.41%, 43.47% and 87.66% respectively. These values were comparable to Bamanikar et al, 10 Atla et al, 11 and Malpani et al 14 (Table -3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Evidences involving the performance of cytological abnormalities for predicting intraepithelial and invasive cervical neoplasias, whether squamous or glandular, were found with SE ranging from 30 to 100%, and SP from 86.8 to 99.3%. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] This large divergence may be due to the diversity of cut-off points chosen to consider the tests as positive or negative, as well as to the use of different morphological criteria to interpret cytological smears and classify abnormal findings. Conversely, a study that used ASC-H þ as a cut-off point to ascertain the performance for the detection of CIN 2 þ reported SE of 67.9% and SP of 87%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%