2008
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytogenetic Characterization and AFLP-Based Genetic Linkage Mapping for the Butterfly Bicyclus anynana, Covering All 28 Karyotyped Chromosomes

Abstract: BackgroundThe chromosome characteristics of the butterfly Bicyclus anynana, have received little attention, despite the scientific importance of this species. This study presents the characterization of chromosomes in this species by means of cytogenetic analysis and linkage mapping.Methodology/Principal FindingsPhysical genomic features in the butterfly B. anynana were examined by karyotype analysis and construction of a linkage map. Lepidoptera possess a female heterogametic W-Z sex chromosome system. The WZ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interpretation of 3:1 segregating both informative (BI) dominant AFLP markers (mother and father heterozygous) is problematic in Lepidoptera because heterozygotes cannot be distinguished from the dominant homozygotes in the offspring and, moreover, they include the nonrecombinant maternal component. A number of approaches have been used to deal with these dominant BI markers in Lepidoptera (Jiggins et al, 2005;Kapan et al, 2006;Yasukochi et al, 2006;Van't Hof et al, 2008), each predicted to give a reasonable approximation of the actual marker order. We opted not to compromise the reliability of the linkage map and use only markers that are fully informative in all offspring.…”
Section: Linkage Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Interpretation of 3:1 segregating both informative (BI) dominant AFLP markers (mother and father heterozygous) is problematic in Lepidoptera because heterozygotes cannot be distinguished from the dominant homozygotes in the offspring and, moreover, they include the nonrecombinant maternal component. A number of approaches have been used to deal with these dominant BI markers in Lepidoptera (Jiggins et al, 2005;Kapan et al, 2006;Yasukochi et al, 2006;Van't Hof et al, 2008), each predicted to give a reasonable approximation of the actual marker order. We opted not to compromise the reliability of the linkage map and use only markers that are fully informative in all offspring.…”
Section: Linkage Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subsequent selective PCR amplification (selamp) used the same reaction mix as preamp except that 1.5 ml diluted preamp product replaced restriction-ligation as the template and the primers used were 100 nM fluorescent Eco þ 3 and 300 nM Mse þ 2 or Hha þ 2. Preamp and selamp thermal cycling profiles are described in Van't Hof et al (2008). The codes of the AFLP markers in Figures 1 and 2 refer to the primers and fragment length, with lowercase m, h and e for Mse, Hha and Eco primer cores, respectively, followed by the extensions in uppercase and the fragment size (for example, mAGeACG178).…”
Section: Marker Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations