Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2012
DOI: 10.1080/13632469.2012.707345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyclic Tests on External RC Beam-Column Joints: Role of Seismic Design Level and Axial Load Value on the Ultimate Capacity

Abstract: A wide experimental program on beam-column RC joints carried out in the framework of the DPC-Reluis Project (DPC: Department of Civil Protection, Reluis: Network of University Laboratories of Earthquake Engineering) is presented. All the experimental tests were performed at the Laboratory of Structures of the University of Basilicata, Potenza (Italy). The main objective of the experimental campaign is to study and compare the post-elastic behaviour of beam-column joints with different earthquake resistant desi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LSLS is deemed to be exceeded considering the seismic intensity at which the chord rotation demand on the plastic hinge of the weaker element reaches the ultimate capacity, conventionally assumed at 20% strength loss. This value substantially complies with the provisions in [58], as well as is coherent to the performance found in experimental investigations (e.g., [73]). In X direction, the seismic intensity value that is related to DLLS and LSLS is equal to 0.105 g and 0.163 g, respectively.…”
Section: Seismic Assessment Of the As-built Structuresupporting
confidence: 75%
“…LSLS is deemed to be exceeded considering the seismic intensity at which the chord rotation demand on the plastic hinge of the weaker element reaches the ultimate capacity, conventionally assumed at 20% strength loss. This value substantially complies with the provisions in [58], as well as is coherent to the performance found in experimental investigations (e.g., [73]). In X direction, the seismic intensity value that is related to DLLS and LSLS is equal to 0.105 g and 0.163 g, respectively.…”
Section: Seismic Assessment Of the As-built Structuresupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Several cyclic tests on subassemblages representing WB-C connections have been carried out (Gentry and Wight, 1992;LaFave and Wight, 1997;Quintero-Febres and Wight, 1997;Siah et al, 2003;Benavent-Climent, 2007;Benavent-Climent et al, 2009 and2010;Li and Kulkarni, 2010, Masi et al, 2013aand 2013bFadwa et al, 2014). All these studies capture different conditions (e.g., interior or exterior Most of these phenomena can be reproduced with different strut-and-tie mechanisms, as shown for a typical 3D sub-assemblage of interior WB-C connection with upper slab and transverse beam in Fig.…”
Section: Experimental Behaviour and Analytical Models Of Wbfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the viewpoint of the behavior's study, most of the research has been focused on beam-column joint equipped with conventional (the adjective is used referring to beams having the depth larger than the width) beams, either seismically designed [2] or underdesigned (e.g., [3,4]). More recently experimental studies focused on joints equipped with wide beams (also called flat, as they have the width larger than the depth).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%