1979
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.76.7.3194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyclic AMP as a modulator of polarity in polycistronic transcriptional units.

Abstract: The degree of natural polarity in the lactose and galactose operons of Escherichia coli is affected by adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP). This effect, mediated by the cAMP receptor protein, is exerted at sites distinct from the promoter. Experiments performed with a mutant bearing a thermosensitive rho factor activity indicate that cAMP relieves polarity by interfering with transcription termination. Conflicting results in the literature concerning the role of cAMP receptor protein and cAMP in galact… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0
1

Year Published

1982
1982
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…GalE and GalT are also involved in internal inducer synthesis, when glucose is limited and extracellular galactose is not available (Death and Ferenci, 1994). Previous results indicate that transcription from the P1 galE promoter results in equimolar expression of the Gal enzymes, serving the catabolic requirements, while transcription from the P2galE promoter results in dis-coordinated expression (more expression of the promoter-proximal cistrons than the promoter-distal ones), which suites the biosynthetic requirements (Ullmann et al, 1979;Adhya, 2003;Semsey et al, 2006). Transcription of both P1galE and P2galE can be regulated by GalR and cAMP-CRP, while GalS affects only P1 galE activity.…”
Section: Regulation Of the Metabolic Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GalE and GalT are also involved in internal inducer synthesis, when glucose is limited and extracellular galactose is not available (Death and Ferenci, 1994). Previous results indicate that transcription from the P1 galE promoter results in equimolar expression of the Gal enzymes, serving the catabolic requirements, while transcription from the P2galE promoter results in dis-coordinated expression (more expression of the promoter-proximal cistrons than the promoter-distal ones), which suites the biosynthetic requirements (Ullmann et al, 1979;Adhya, 2003;Semsey et al, 2006). Transcription of both P1galE and P2galE can be regulated by GalR and cAMP-CRP, while GalS affects only P1 galE activity.…”
Section: Regulation Of the Metabolic Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When cAMP levels are reduced by mutations (cya − ) or catabolite repression (glucose as carbon source), the levels of GalK and GalT decline (the GalK level, in particular), but the GalE level remains high, resulting in an approximately fourfold increase in the GalE-to-GalK ratio. We note, however, that there are minor disagreements as to how cAMP levels or carbon source affect galE expression (Ullmann et al 1979;Joseph et al 1981;Adhya 1987). The discoordinate expression is more severe in the absence of a functional cAMP-CRP complex and can be suppressed in glucose-grown cells or in cya − strains by the addition of cAMP to the growth medium.…”
Section: What Is the Function Of Spot 42 Rna?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, work on the galactose operon has revealed that the cAMP-CRP complex, directly or indirectly, influences synthesis of the products of this operon differentially (Ullmann et al 1979;Joseph et al 1981;Adhya 1987). The E. coli galETKM operon is unusual in two respects.…”
Section: What Is the Function Of Spot 42 Rna?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Escherichia cofi, cAMP is also involved as a modulator of catabolite repression: low cAMP levels are correlated with a severe reduction in the synthesis of enzymes involved in carbon catabolism. In addition, the CAMP-CAP complex is involved in transcription termination of several polycistronic operons (Ullmann et al, 1979;Guidi-Rontani et al, 1984). However, whereas the molecular mode of action of the CAMP-CAP complex seems relatively well understood (De Crombrugghe et a f .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%