2016
DOI: 10.17265/2328-2185/2016.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyberspace: A New Threat to the Sovereignty of the State

Abstract: This paper discusses one of the contemporary challenging issues-it is the challenge of e-commerce to the sovereignty of the state, where governments are unable to implement their own laws on disputed cases resulting from trans-border e-commerce interactions. The objective of the current research is to draw attention to the impact of international characteristics of e-commerce on the sovereignty of state, and to identify the factors affecting this sovereignty. The issue of the dynamicity of time and place will … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…States are adapting to this networked and fragmented governance more or less enthusiastically by attempting to shape standards and practices in a multi-stakeholder environment (Mueller et al 2013). The use of alternative means to regulate cyberspace has allowed the interference of non-state actors at the expense of state institutions, and this undermines the power of the state in cyberspace (Adams and Albakajai 2016;Gendron 2013), which manifests in most states' inability to control flows of information, capital, and services across cyberspace.…”
Section: Fragmentation Of Authoritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…States are adapting to this networked and fragmented governance more or less enthusiastically by attempting to shape standards and practices in a multi-stakeholder environment (Mueller et al 2013). The use of alternative means to regulate cyberspace has allowed the interference of non-state actors at the expense of state institutions, and this undermines the power of the state in cyberspace (Adams and Albakajai 2016;Gendron 2013), which manifests in most states' inability to control flows of information, capital, and services across cyberspace.…”
Section: Fragmentation Of Authoritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Globalization questions the state's status quo as the sole owner of sovereignty, which is still trapped in the territorial paradigm. Globalization and technological developments bring new challenges: dematerialization (everything is paperless), de-temporalization (instant communication), and deterritorialization (not boundaries and geographical distances) of online activities and interactions [1]. Even if sovereignty encompasses the digital and there are physical factors such as ownership of company data banks [44], this does not prevent the state hegemony from eroding in international politics, in which technology companies become dominant actors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%