2012
DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2011.0588
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyberbullying: The Challenge to Define

Abstract: Cyberbullying is a reality of the digital age. To address this phenomenon, it becomes imperative to understand exactly what cyberbullying is. Thus, establishing a workable and theoretically sound definition is essential. This article contributes to the existing literature in relation to the definition of cyberbullying. The specific elements of repetition, power imbalance, intention, and aggression, regarded as essential criteria of traditional face-to-face bullying, are considered in the cyber context. It is p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
156
0
36

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 313 publications
(221 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
156
0
36
Order By: Relevance
“…For the revised CBQ, see Appendix A. Sumscores were calculated (minimum score, 8; maximum score, 40) and the resulting eightitem CBQ was reliable with an average Cronbach a of .82 (average of three waves: M ¼ 8.87, SD ¼ 2.49). Some researchers argued that, in contrast to face-to-face bullying, repetitiveness is not a prerequisite for cyberbullying because a single act such as spreading rumors about someone online can lead to ongoing humiliation and may last on the Internet forever [2,31]. Furthermore, adolescents may find it hard to admit that they performed cyberbullying behavior.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the revised CBQ, see Appendix A. Sumscores were calculated (minimum score, 8; maximum score, 40) and the resulting eightitem CBQ was reliable with an average Cronbach a of .82 (average of three waves: M ¼ 8.87, SD ¼ 2.49). Some researchers argued that, in contrast to face-to-face bullying, repetitiveness is not a prerequisite for cyberbullying because a single act such as spreading rumors about someone online can lead to ongoing humiliation and may last on the Internet forever [2,31]. Furthermore, adolescents may find it hard to admit that they performed cyberbullying behavior.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These behaviours were identified from literature review and through 16 in-depth interviews during the pilot phase with and were validated among Vietnamese students (Le et al, 2016a). A definition adapted from Ybarra, Boyd, Korchmaros, and Oppenheim (2012) and Langos (2012) was given to students prior to the completing the questionnaires in order to standardise understanding of bullying. For the victimisation scale, students were prompted with the question 'How often have you been bullied in any way during the last six months?'…”
Section: Bullying Victimisation and Perpetrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esta nueva forma de victimización entre pares involucra el uso de las tecnologías -teléfono celular, envío de SMS, uso de Internet, etc.,-para ejercer daño sobre una(s) víctima(s), que no puede defenderse fácilmente. El cyberbullying -al igual que en el bullying tradicional -se caracteriza por la intencionalidad de ejercer daño, la reiteración de la conducta agresiva, y el desequilibrio de poderes entre la víctima y el agresor (Langos, 2012). Sin embargo, a diferencia de éste, se caracteriza por la invisibilidad del agresor (Spears, Slee, Owens & Johnson, 2009), el aumento potencial del número de personas que pueden ser espectadores de la agresión y, la re-victimización constante (Wong--Lo, Bullock & Gable, 2011).…”
Section: Bullying Y Cyberbullyingunclassified