2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10287-014-0209-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cutting plane algorithms for mean-CVaR portfolio optimization with nonconvex transaction costs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We derive some theoretical results in Section II under the proposed Wasserstein ambiguity set. Moreover, to obtain the optimal portfolio strategy, models (11) and (12) are solved in this subsection.…”
Section: A Data and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We derive some theoretical results in Section II under the proposed Wasserstein ambiguity set. Moreover, to obtain the optimal portfolio strategy, models (11) and (12) are solved in this subsection.…”
Section: A Data and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without loss of generality, we set the parameter ∆ j = 1, j = 1, ..., m in model (12). Note that the constraints on the box and budget uncertainty set are both linear.…”
Section: Comparisons Between Box and Budget Uncertainty Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 1 shows only an illustrative example of a piecewise linear function based on Takano et al (2015). The procedure for a piecewise linear approximation is described as follows:…”
Section: Piecewise Linear Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%