2004
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.5.2739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cutting Edge: Activation of Toll-Like Receptor 2 Induces a Th2 Immune Response and Promotes Experimental Asthma

Abstract: Recognition of microbial components by APCs and their activation through Toll-like receptors (TLR) leads to the induction of adaptive immune responses. In this study, we show that activation of TLR2 by its synthetic ligand Pam3Cys, in contrast to activation of TLR9 by immunostimulatory DNA (ISS-ODN), induces a prominent Th2-biased immune response. Activation of APCs by Pam3Cys resulted in the induction of Th2-associated effector molecules like IL-13, and IL-1β, GM-CSF and up-regulation of B7RP-1, but low level… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

24
309
5
6

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 414 publications
(344 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
24
309
5
6
Order By: Relevance
“…inhibit early IL-4 production by responding CD4 T cells and thus inhibit Th2 cell development. Our data indicating that TLR 2 ligands profoundly inhibit Th2 cell development are contradictory to those findings that have suggested the role of TLR2 ligands in the induction of Th2 responses (20,(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38). Nevertheless, there is a large body of published data that is consistent with our findings showing that TLR2 ligands, including Pam 3 Cys, either promote Th1 responses or inhibit Th2 responses (39 -47).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…inhibit early IL-4 production by responding CD4 T cells and thus inhibit Th2 cell development. Our data indicating that TLR 2 ligands profoundly inhibit Th2 cell development are contradictory to those findings that have suggested the role of TLR2 ligands in the induction of Th2 responses (20,(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38). Nevertheless, there is a large body of published data that is consistent with our findings showing that TLR2 ligands, including Pam 3 Cys, either promote Th1 responses or inhibit Th2 responses (39 -47).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…It is interesting that the low doses of LPS encouraged a predominant Th2-type response and tissue infiltration with eosinophils, whereas those that were given the higher dose produced a Th1 response and lung infiltration with neutrophils (12). When lipopeptide is used as an adjuvant with ovalbumin, it can exacerbate experimental asthma and produce an associated systemic Th2 response, which, unlike LPS, is not dose dependent (13). Another study investigated the effect of TLR2 agonists on established airway inflammation and discovered that lipopeptide actually attenuated disease, and this was associated with an increase in IFN-␥ and therefore predominant Th1-type response (11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five days later, mice received an injection of 160 l of NTS via the tail vein to induce disease. The dose of lipopeptide and NTS given were based on those used in other in vivo studies and on our own pilot studies (13). At 14 d after disease induction, mice were killed and exsanguinated for serum, and the kidneys were harvested.…”
Section: Induction Of Accelerated Nephrotoxic Nephritismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our data showed that, neurotoxin, some fungal lysates and LPS from the mucosal pathogen Porphyromonas gingivalis bias immune responses towards Th2. [31][32][33][34][35] As there is evidence that TLR synergy can enhance immune responses, [36][37][38][39] the inclusion in a vaccine of multiple TLR agonists may prove highly beneficial. However, the extent to which TLR stimulation, especially that induced by combined TLR agonists, influences immunological potency and the overall Th1/Th2 balance of the immune response is largely unknown.…”
Section: ©2 0 1 1 L a N D E S B I O S C I E N C E D O N O T D I S Tmentioning
confidence: 99%