“…The closed-form solution requires to predefine the ratio and computes the and 's needed. One then simply applies the desired value of in (9) to calculate . On the other hand, the exact solution needs to predefine both and beforehand.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the calculation of the OTM modes, the same formulas (7) and (8) are used with 's in place of 's. Gathering terms, the normalized cutoff wavenumbers can be obtained in closed form using the algebraic expression for modes; for modes (9) and respectively, for . In (9), are the cutoff wavenumbers of the coaxial circular waveguide, namely, the roots of the equation [19] ( 10) where and are Bessel and Neumann functions.…”
Section: A Tm Modesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [9], the authors derived closed-form expressions for the cutoff wavelengths of the single elliptical metallic waveguide, while in [10] closed-form expressions for the cutoff wavenumbers of elliptical dielectric waveguides were obtained. In [11], closed-form expressions were obtained for the simpler geometry of an eccentric circular metallic waveguide.…”
In this paper, we propose an efficient method for the calculation of the cutoff wavenumbers of coaxial elliptical-circular and circular-elliptical metallic waveguides. The cutoff wavenumbers are obtained through closed-form expressions making the evaluation efficient, and moreover, very accurate even for large values of the eccentricity of the elliptical boundary. The resulting formulas are free of Mathieu functions, including only simple algebraic expressions with Bessel functions, and are valid for every different value of the indices and , corresponding to every higher order or mode. The validation of the method is performed by comparing to the general exact solution. The efficiency and accuracy of our method is presented by illustrative examples. Numerical results are given for the cutoff wavenumbers of various higher order modes.
“…The closed-form solution requires to predefine the ratio and computes the and 's needed. One then simply applies the desired value of in (9) to calculate . On the other hand, the exact solution needs to predefine both and beforehand.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the calculation of the OTM modes, the same formulas (7) and (8) are used with 's in place of 's. Gathering terms, the normalized cutoff wavenumbers can be obtained in closed form using the algebraic expression for modes; for modes (9) and respectively, for . In (9), are the cutoff wavenumbers of the coaxial circular waveguide, namely, the roots of the equation [19] ( 10) where and are Bessel and Neumann functions.…”
Section: A Tm Modesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [9], the authors derived closed-form expressions for the cutoff wavelengths of the single elliptical metallic waveguide, while in [10] closed-form expressions for the cutoff wavenumbers of elliptical dielectric waveguides were obtained. In [11], closed-form expressions were obtained for the simpler geometry of an eccentric circular metallic waveguide.…”
In this paper, we propose an efficient method for the calculation of the cutoff wavenumbers of coaxial elliptical-circular and circular-elliptical metallic waveguides. The cutoff wavenumbers are obtained through closed-form expressions making the evaluation efficient, and moreover, very accurate even for large values of the eccentricity of the elliptical boundary. The resulting formulas are free of Mathieu functions, including only simple algebraic expressions with Bessel functions, and are valid for every different value of the indices and , corresponding to every higher order or mode. The validation of the method is performed by comparing to the general exact solution. The efficiency and accuracy of our method is presented by illustrative examples. Numerical results are given for the cutoff wavenumbers of various higher order modes.
“…In [3], Mei and Xu calculated the cutoff wavelength of the dominant mode in elliptical waveguide by the transverse resonance technique. Tsogkas et al [4] provided the exact closed-form algebraic expressions of cutoff wavelength for elliptical metallic waveguide with small values of eccentricity. In [5], Shu analyzed the elliptical waveguides with arbitrary ellipticity by the differential quadrature method, which combines with the coordinate transform to deal with the elliptical shape boundary.…”
In this paper, the regularized meshless method (RMM) combined with the determinant rule is taken to analyze the cutoff wavelength of elliptical waveguide with arbitrary eccentricity. First, an improved desingularization technique of subtracting and adding back is introduced for RMM to discretize this problem. Then, the novel local minimum finding technique on the basis of Chebfun is applied to extract the cutoff wavelength from the determinant of the interpolation matrix of RMM. The numerical examples show that the RMM obtains consistent results with the conventional method of fundamental solutions but has advantage of well-conditioning and no fictitious boundary. Our method provides another highly effective and stable candidate to solve the cutoff wavelength of elliptical waveguide. Figure 5. (a)-(e), the f(l) curves approximated by Chebfun; (f), the condition number curves of the method of fundamental solutions (MFS) and regularized meshless method (RMM) with e = 0.9. 424 R. SONG AND X. CHEN
“…This also leads to the fact that the cutoff wavenumbers are safely separated each other, at least by 0:2, in the case where 1 = 2 D 2:56, since, the larger the contrast between the core and the cladding permittivity, the larger the separation between the modes. This is why we notice a change in the order between lines No 7 and 8 in Tables 2.3 This behaviour appeared also in the TE e1n and TE o1n (n > 1) modes of the elliptical metallic waveguide [71].…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.