Customer service understanding: gender differences of frontline employees

Abstract

PurposeDespite widespread acknowledgement of the importance of employees to the success of service firms, research into how well frontline service staff understand service remains scarce. This study aims to investigate what constitutes good customer service from the viewpoint of frontline service employees and to explore gender differences in particular.Design/methodology/approachThe data were collected from 876 frontline employees across a wide range of service industries. An automated text analysis using Leximancer explored general and gender‐specific patterns in employees' customer service understanding.FindingsIrrespective of gender, frontline service staff share the perception that the pillars of good customer service are listening skills, making the customer happy, and offering service. Males have a more functional, outcome‐oriented interpretation of customer service; females focus more on the actual service interaction and emotional outcomes.Practical implicationsBy acknowledging gender‐based dissimilarities in the customer service understanding of frontline service employees, the efficiency of recruitment and training processes will be enhanced.Originality/valueThis study contributes to limited work on service models of frontline staff and shows that gender can explain some differences. This study also adds another dimension to the understanding of gender effects in services, beyond its influence on customers' quality perceptions and behaviours. The results are important for services marketing research and for managers in charge of recruiting and training frontline service staff.

The Architecture of Dynamic Capability Research Identifying the Building Blocks of a Configurational Approach

“…Leximancer conducts both conceptual (thematic) and relational (semantic) analyses of text data and then provides visual depictions of these analyses. It allows the researcher to examine concepts (common text elements) and themes and contradictions (groupings of uncovered concepts) used by other scholars (Mathies & Burford, 2011). To do so, a Bayesian machine-learning algorithm is applied to uncover the main concepts in text and how they relate to each other (Campbell et al, 2011).…”

How can gender signal employee qualities in retailing?

“…Between these dimensions, our findings in the retail context infer that male employees are more oriented to professional relations, while female employees are more oriented to social relations. This also corresponds to research in customer service noting that women are process-oriented while men are outcome-oriented (Iacobucci and Ostrom, 1993;Mattila et al, 2003;Mathies and Burford, 2011).…”

“…On the other, this implies that employees can potentially be stereotyped or discriminated against based on the simple observation of their gender. Mathies and Burford (2011) found that the interpretation of good customer service is influenced by the gender of the employee, noting that customers may expect, and respond better to staff of the 'appropriate' gender.…”

Gender Differences in Perceptions of Work Experiences and Service Quality Provided By Front-Line Service Workers in Four- And Five- Star Hotels in Turkey: A Research Note

“…Mathies and Burford (2010), in a sample of 876 frontline employees from a wide range of industries in Australia found, that females had a significantly higher service orientation than did males. Using automated text analysis for responses to an open-ended question ("What do you think is good customer service?…”