Customer responses to integrity issues for travel services in China

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore integrity issues for travel services in China using the framework of a stress and coping model to focus on customers’ perceived unfairness, responsibility attribution and their negative emotions. Design/methodology/approach – A content analysis of 80 online customer complaints provides a brief profile of these integrity issues. Findings – Integrity issues frequently appear during service delivery and are primarily rooted in the unethical behavior of travel service employees or partners. Service contracts and fairness are used by customers as standards to evaluate harm caused by integrity issues. Customers attribute responsibility for these issues to the travel agency or tour operator, and not their employees. Finally, customers feel angry and disappointed when they experience an integrity issue and sometimes feel helpless. Research limitations/implications – Future studies can collect data by multiple means and further examine the correlations between customers’ cognitive appraisals, negative emotions and relationship outcomes in the context of integrity violation. Practical implications – Integrity management in travel services should be integrated with service management and promise management. Travel agencies must take immediate actions to reduce the negative influences of integrity issues. Moreover, the tourism sector in China should make efforts to control integrity problems at the industry level. Originality/value – This study contributes to the prior model of trust violation by investigating the trigger events of integrity violation and emphasizing the roles of customers’ perceived unfairness and negative emotions.

Managing corporate brand behavioural integrity: a case of alleged violation of Halal certification

“…Later, LeClair (1998) and Kaptein and Wempe (2002) further explored her idea. Corporate integrity can manifest itself as organization sense of wholeness, consistency of words and actions, consistency in adverse situations, authenticity and adherence to the sound moral and ethical values (Gong et al, 2015;Palanski and Yammarino, 2007). An organization desire to achieve this state of integrity will need to demonstrate its commitment to sound moral principles, should take responsible actions and exhibit consistency in its words and deeds towards all of its stakeholders (Brown, 2005;Calhoun, 1995;Maak, 2008;Srivastva, 1988).…”

“…Nonetheless, much of the past research on behavioural integrity was conducted from an internal stakeholder perspective and explored at the individual level (Davis and Rothstein, 2006;Hong, 2016;Innocenti et al, 2012;Mavis et al, 2019;Prottas, 2008;Simons et al, 2018). Consequently, literature on firms' integrity and particularly the integrity of its behaviour in public province has not developed in tandem (Fiorito and Ehrenhard, 2019;Gong et al, 2015). Thus, it is not surprising to identify that firms are ill-equipped with the mechanism and tools to monitor and manage their corporate brand integrity (Mavis et al, 2019).…”

“…Instead of reinventing the wheel, we argue that the leader behavioural integrity scale is readily conceivable to gauge stakeholders' perceptions towards a corporate brand behavioural integrity (Gong et al, 2015;Palanski and Yammarino, 2009;Simons et al, 2015;Simons, 2002). In the domain of social sciences, it is appropriate to examine the perceptions of organizations or coherent groups for disposition qualities that are commonly associated with individuals (Bachmann et al, 2015;Hamilton and Sherman, 1996;Okhmatovskiy and Shin, 2019;Wagner et al, 2009).…”

The Influence of Organizational Culture, Knowledge and Social Capital Management Strategies on Small and Medium Business Performance in the Food Industry

“…Social capital in this case can be defined as a concept that represents the assets and obligations that are not in the form of material and influencing cooperation between individuals or companies (Eklinder -Frick et al, 2014). Culture acts as an emotional intuition movement learned by groups or organizations to overcome problems (Zhu, 2015) and influences the direction of management internally and externally Social capital has integrity that can help companies to develop and foster healthy relationships with customers, suppliers and stakeholders (Gong et al, 2015). Integrity is seen as a core value that is embedded in corporate culture (Monga, 2016).…”

Examining service shortfalls

“…These studies of Chinese GPT service quality were critically reviewed to provide a pool of items to serve as the basis for measurement of the core components GPTs. To start with, this study limits the domain of GPT services to on-tour services under direct control of tour operators, given the fact that tourists’ evaluation of GPT services is mainly based on on-tour service (Bowie and Chang, 2005) and the critical role and responsibility tour operators bear in delivering GPT services (Chang, 2009; Gong et al, 2015). Items that are outside the scope of the on-tour services, for example, accuracy of information provided by the front desk of tour operators (Sheng, 1999), were removed.…”