1999
DOI: 10.1080/000368499323210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Customer racial discrimination for baseball memorabilia

Abstract: This paper investigates customer racial discrimination in the market for baseball cards. It extends previous research by measuring customer racial preferences at the beginning and end of players' careers. Our results indicate that customer biases against active Black and Hispanic baseball players may be mitigated by differential expectations of future performance. However, over time we detect statistical differences in rookie card prices by ethnicity, as performance expectations become less important at the en… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly there is evidence of both racial progress and continued inequality in the media that are exclusively dedicated to sports news coverage (see Gonzales et al 2006;Gabriel et al 1999;Evans 1997). The media descriptions and depictions are significant because, as Richard Majors (1998) has observed, sports and the sport media do not operate in a vacuum, and for that reason they reflect (and inform) the economic and social systems that support them.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Similarly there is evidence of both racial progress and continued inequality in the media that are exclusively dedicated to sports news coverage (see Gonzales et al 2006;Gabriel et al 1999;Evans 1997). The media descriptions and depictions are significant because, as Richard Majors (1998) has observed, sports and the sport media do not operate in a vacuum, and for that reason they reflect (and inform) the economic and social systems that support them.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Some research has found a racial bias in card values (Fort and Gill 2000;Regoli 2000;Gabriel et al 1999;Bloom 1997;Andersen and LaCroix 1991;Hines 1991;Nardinelli and Simon 1990). Other research appears to find minimal or no racial bias, or report mixed results Primm et al 2006;Hewitt et al 2005;Messitte and Powell 1995;Regoli 1991).…”
Section: Race and Sports Cardsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…For example, Gabriel et al (1999) examined rookie cards 2 of baseball players produced by Topps between 1974 and1982;Nardinelli and Simon (1990) investigated all cards of baseball players produced by Topps in 1970; Hewitt et al (2005) examined a sub-sample of rookie cards of members of the baseball Hall of Fame (HOF); and Primm et al (2006) studied a sub-sample of rookie cards of members of the Pro Football HOF and non-members who had been on the final ballot for election. Other differences between the studies in this area include the variety of independent variables utilized as well as their measurement.…”
Section: Race and Sports Cardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But other factors might also influence which cards become more sought after and valued. Some research has explored the notion that racism might play a role in the social activity of sports card collecting (Andersen and La Croix 1991;Fort and Gill 2000;Gabriel et al 1999;Hewitt et al 2005;Messitte and Powell 1995;Nardinelli and Simon 1990;Regoli 1991Regoli , 2000Regoli et al 2005;Stone and Warren 1999). With the exception of Regoli and his colleagues (2005), none of the research has been on football cards.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%