2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2007.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Customary landholding institutions and housing development in urban centres of Ghana: Case Studies of Kumasi and Wa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They emphasize that the inherent 'social security' and egalitarian features of customary tenure arrangements ensure equitable access to land by all members of the landholding community to the extent that there is no landlessness as well promote ecological preservation (Berry, 1993;Kasanga, , 2001). Supporters of this view further argue that the customary tenure arrangements are resilient and dynamic not constraining investments in sustainable land management (Abdulai and Ndekugri, 2007;Blocher, 2006;Bromley, 2009;Kasanga and Kotey, 2001). They prescribe a decentralized approach to land management at the local level as opposed to a state-centric approach.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They emphasize that the inherent 'social security' and egalitarian features of customary tenure arrangements ensure equitable access to land by all members of the landholding community to the extent that there is no landlessness as well promote ecological preservation (Berry, 1993;Kasanga, , 2001). Supporters of this view further argue that the customary tenure arrangements are resilient and dynamic not constraining investments in sustainable land management (Abdulai and Ndekugri, 2007;Blocher, 2006;Bromley, 2009;Kasanga and Kotey, 2001). They prescribe a decentralized approach to land management at the local level as opposed to a state-centric approach.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Public lands are those that are compulsorily acquired, managed and controlled by the government for the people of Ghana, and comprise 20% of the total land area. On the other hand, private lands, which are owned by stools, skins, families and individuals, account for 78% of the total land area of Ghana (Abdulai & Ndekugri, 2007;Larbi, 2008). Vested lands (2%) are those with split ownership between the government and the traditional authorities (MLF, 1999).…”
Section: Nexus Between Peri-urban Development and Indigenous Livelihoodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, land management arrangements in the suburban and periurban areas have been gradually transformed from the traditional liberal market in this urbanizing district to an almost exclusive male dominated market [14][15][16]. These suburban areas therefore sit at the nexus of traditional practices and practices influenced by colonial masters [17,18]. The mix of these systems has shown to be a disadvantage to women, especially with regards to land access [10].…”
Section: Introduction: Land and Competitive Urban Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%