2017
DOI: 10.1002/xrs.2760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Curve‐fitting regression: improving light element quantification with XRF

Abstract: Light elements are hard to quantify by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometry because, after a photoelectric excitation, they predominantly relax emitting Auger electrons, greatly reducing the fluorescence count thus limiting the signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) observed. Low SNR values have deleterious outcomes in model building. Notable in ordinary least squares (OLS) regression based on peak height, they also affect more robust regression methods, such as partial least squares regression. While low SNR can also … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the contents of most of the elements slightly decreased because of the extremely large particle size of WL, which limits the intrusion depth of HNO 3 treatment . After the HNO 3 treatment of WL (HN-WL), the B content was not detected because of photon reabsorption that limits the analysis depth of light elements (i.e., B) in XRF analysis . Because the near-surface B content of HN-WL was removed by HNO 3 treatment, the B content could not be detected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the contents of most of the elements slightly decreased because of the extremely large particle size of WL, which limits the intrusion depth of HNO 3 treatment . After the HNO 3 treatment of WL (HN-WL), the B content was not detected because of photon reabsorption that limits the analysis depth of light elements (i.e., B) in XRF analysis . Because the near-surface B content of HN-WL was removed by HNO 3 treatment, the B content could not be detected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…XRF spectra were interpolated through multiple Gaussian [31][32][33][34] functions in the proximity of the energy lines of the expected elements to obtain the peak area. The considered peaks were Cu Kα, Zn Kα, Au Lα, Pd Kα and Sn Kα; in addition Cu Kβ and Zn Kβ were also fitted to avoid errors due to peak overlaps.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Light elements, with an atomic number below 11, cannot be accurately quantified by XRF. For these elements, it is difficult to ionize an atom with the photoelectric excitation and the produced signals are trapped within the sample itself (Kikongi et al, 2017). The light elements, such as carbon, are of particular interest in this study and therefore it was necessary to quantify their composition with an alternative method.…”
Section: Bulk Chemical Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%