2018
DOI: 10.20319/pijss.2018.33.16831693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Curriculum Compacting: Differentiating Algebra Syllabus According to the Readiness Levels of Gifted Students

Abstract: Gifted learners are unique, in the way they learn i.e. in processing new information and knowledge. Because of their uniqueness, teachers need to identify their learning preferences prior to lesson planning, and differentiate their instruction accordingly with appropriate classroom strategies. This study investigated a differentiation strategy called curriculum compacting, which was applied in the teaching of Algebra among gifted students.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several theoretical and practical implications of the findings as far as the development and implementation of school-based gifted education are concerned. First, in conjunction with other evidence in Western contexts (e.g., [58][59][60]), the present study offers empirical support for the positive impact of different instructional practices on students such as curriculum compacting, differentiation and enrichment triad activities. Second, the findings of this study also suggest that the three-tier implementation model of gifted education could serve not only as a valid and viable model for the systematic delivery of learning opportunities and services to the gifted and talented, but also as the basis for quality teaching [61].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…There are several theoretical and practical implications of the findings as far as the development and implementation of school-based gifted education are concerned. First, in conjunction with other evidence in Western contexts (e.g., [58][59][60]), the present study offers empirical support for the positive impact of different instructional practices on students such as curriculum compacting, differentiation and enrichment triad activities. Second, the findings of this study also suggest that the three-tier implementation model of gifted education could serve not only as a valid and viable model for the systematic delivery of learning opportunities and services to the gifted and talented, but also as the basis for quality teaching [61].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Moreover, Tomlinson and Imbeau (2010) in their study stated that student readiness, interest and learning profile are the main factors of consideration of teachers in the implementation of differentiated teaching. Teachers need to learn to develop routines (differentiate curriculum from teaching) in the classroom without neglecting the diversity of students in terms of profile, interest, and willingness to follow learning (Bajrami, 2013;Joli et al, 2017;Tomlinson et al, 2003).…”
Section: Implementation Of Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%