2013
DOI: 10.1308/003588413x13629960048433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current UK practice in emergency laparotomy

Abstract: This report of a large number of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy in the UK confirms a remarkably high mortality by modern standards across the range. Very few pathologies or procedures can be considered anything other than high risk. The need for routine consultant involvement and critical care is evident, and the case distribution helps define the surgical skill set needed for a modern emergency laparotomy service. Preliminary data relating outcomes from emergency colonic surgery to surgical subspeci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
38
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(17 reference statements)
2
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3][4][5] Our study highlighted the fact that several aspects of SS in SA differ from the experience in HICs. [12][13][14][15] The patient cohort is generally much younger than in HICs, as mean life expectancy is lower in SA. The most common SS is intra-abdominal sepsis, which is mainly secondary to acute appendicitis, followed by complicated peptic ulcer disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] Our study highlighted the fact that several aspects of SS in SA differ from the experience in HICs. [12][13][14][15] The patient cohort is generally much younger than in HICs, as mean life expectancy is lower in SA. The most common SS is intra-abdominal sepsis, which is mainly secondary to acute appendicitis, followed by complicated peptic ulcer disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some, such as age, urgency of surgery and surgical pathology are less amenable to interventions that improve outcome [35,38]. Thirty-day mortality following emergency small bowel resection, for example, is 21% compared with 8.8% for emergency right hemicolectomy [39]. However, targeting other factors relating to the delivery of high-quality clinical care in a timely fashion, including haemorrhage and sepsis management, may yield improvements in postoperative mortality and morbidity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6] It is defined as immediate emergency laparoscopy or laparotomy primarily to treat intestinal obstruction, perforated viscus or bowel ischemia. 7 A focus on enhanced recovery programs specifically for patients following AHA surgery is needed to improve the postoperative outcome.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%