2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current status of microplastics and nanoplastics removal methods: Summary, comparison and prospect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 178 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The locomotor response of zebrafish embryos recorded for all live embryos, including malformed embryos and embryos showing no inflation of the swim bladder. The behavioral response was assessed based on mean distance moved in the first light phase interval (minutes [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] and the dark phase interval (minutes . For the violin plots the moved distance were normalized to the mean moved distance of the control for the respective phases, as follows:…”
Section: Locomotor Response (Lmr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The locomotor response of zebrafish embryos recorded for all live embryos, including malformed embryos and embryos showing no inflation of the swim bladder. The behavioral response was assessed based on mean distance moved in the first light phase interval (minutes [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] and the dark phase interval (minutes . For the violin plots the moved distance were normalized to the mean moved distance of the control for the respective phases, as follows:…”
Section: Locomotor Response (Lmr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the major concerns related to plastic pollution is the presence of micro-(MPs) (1 μm-5 mm), and nanoplastics (NPs) (< 1 μm) in the marine ecosystem [11][12][13][14][15] . Various physical, thermochemical, and biological methods are being used for removal of MPs/ NPs from various matrices 16,17 . Due to their small particle size, removing such plastic particles through wastewater treatment is still challenging.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 Such interactions have a profound impact on the environmental dynamics, bioavailability, degradation, transport and toxicity of M/NPs. [34][35][36][37] The diverse adverse effects such as oxidative damage, retorted growth, organelle damage, early mortality, decreased food uptake, inammation, immune malfunctions and aberrant behavior are the major detrimental effects of M/NPs on the aquatic biota. [38][39][40][41][42][43]…”
Section: Ecotoxicological Implications Of M/ Nps On Aquatic Organismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,7 As a result, technologies that can meet these standards are urgently needed. [8][9][10] To date, researchers have evaluated the microplastic removal efficiencies of existing technologies within drinking water treatment plants. [11][12][13][14] Most plants include purification via coagulation/sedimentation and filtration through sand or activated carbon followed by disinfection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%