Current separation and detection methods in microdialysis the drive towards sensitivity and speed

Abstract

This review outlines some of the analytical challenges associated with the analysis of microdialysis (MD) samples, in particular, the minute complex sample volumes that are often encountered. In MD sampling many different low-molecular-weight molecules can be collected, but the research findings are often limited by the sensitivity, specificity, and reliability of the analytical technique that is coupled to the dialysis probe. Therefore it is critical that a lot of consideration is given in selecting the most suitable analytical method including the most appropriate detector. This review aims to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of a range of commonly used analytical methods employed in MD. In Section 1, a brief overview of the MD technique is described, followed by a discussion on some of the advantages and drawbacks of this sampling technique. Sections 2 and 3 examine analytical and other technical considerations regarding analysis, with special emphasis on the factors that specifically influence analytical detection. Section 4 outlines the most commonly employed analytical techniques used in MD, including HPLC coupled with various detectors. Detail is given regarding the LOD and LOQ for many applications using each detector. As MS is of such high importance in MD, a special sub-section has been devoted to it. The importance of CE is also highlighted, with specific applications described. In addition, analytical techniques that do not appear to have found routine use in MD are discussed. Section 5 is concerned with recent innovations in chemical separation techniques, in particular MCE and ultra-performance liquid chromatography. Specific applications of the coupling of these techniques with MD are highlighted, along with technical challenges associated with miniaturization. In the Section 6, the future outlook of MD is discussed. Techniques other than electrophoretic- and chromatographic based separation methods are outside the scope of this review.

Rapid quantification of histamine in human psoriatic plaques using microdialysis and ultra high performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection

“…Microdialysis usually results in the collection of minute sample volumes; the order of a few microliters. In our study, UHPLC has demonstrated that it is capable of handling sample volumes of 1 l or less, which is ideal for coupling with microdialysate sampling, whereas the more conventional LC systems usually require greater than 5 l sample volumes [30]. …”

On the Accuracy of In Vivo Ethanol and Acetaldehyde Monitoring, a Key Tile in the Puzzle of Acetaldehyde as a Neuroactive Agent

“…High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-based analytical methods are largely employed in microdialysis studies (Cheng et al, 2009; Guihen and O’Connor, 2009). With regard to EtOH and ACD determination HPLC-based methods appear particularly suitable, since samples are not heated during analysis and thus heat sensitive or volatile compounds (such as EtOH and ACD) can be efficiently separated.…”

Analytical Considerations for Microdialysis Sampling

“…Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined in both the plasma and the tumor following treatment with a STEALTH liposomal formulation of a camptothecin analog [104] . Online Analysis Using Liquid Chromatography The direct coupling of liquid chromatography to the microdialysis sampling system has several advantages, and this has recently been reviewed by several groups [15,19,56,105,106] . The use of online injectors allows the manipulation of submicroliter sample volumes, thereby improving temporal resolution in comparison to off -line systems.…”