“…Although Nafion has been used and studied extensively over the decades, its structure–property relationships, especially when utilized as nanometer-scale thin films, are still not unambiguously known. A variety of study methods have included swelling measurements, ,, small-angle x-ray scattering (SAXS), − ,,− grazing-incidence small-angle X-ray scattering (GISAXS), , atomic force microscopy, − electrostatic force microscopy, impedance spectroscopy, contact angle measurements, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), − cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM), diffraction, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, neutron scattering, − neutron reflectometry, infrared spectroscopy, , and ionic diffusion. , To summarize the extensive literature on Nafion, these numerous studies have produced a variety of simulation results, reconstructions, and models, − which often comprise round and/or cylindrical shapes, that have been used to predict the film transport coefficient, proton transport , and structure. However, there exists no consensus as to which of the several models best describes clustering in Nafion or whether the assumed channels in Nafion are connected and precisely in which way.…”