2017
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current Mood vs. Recalled Impacts of Current Moods after Exposures to Sequences of Uncertain Monetary Outcomes

Abstract: Events in a sequence may each be evaluated as good or bad. We propose that such good-bad evaluations evoke emotional responses that change current mood. A model of recurrent updating of current mood is developed and compared to a model of how a sequence of events evoking emotional responses is evaluated retrospectively. In Experiment 1, 149 undergraduates are presented sequences of lottery outcomes with a fixed probability of losing or winning different amounts of money. Ratings of current mood are made after … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this purpose, we developed a novel Primacy model that we pitted against the standard Recency model. We then also examine a host of other plausible models as suggested in disparate literatures about valuation timing (Daniel Kahneman & Tversky, 2000;Olsson, Garling, Ettema, Friman, & Stahl, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, we developed a novel Primacy model that we pitted against the standard Recency model. We then also examine a host of other plausible models as suggested in disparate literatures about valuation timing (Daniel Kahneman & Tversky, 2000;Olsson, Garling, Ettema, Friman, & Stahl, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measure of emotional well-being is obtained by asking the employed and unemployed participants to make ratings of daily mood ("Have do you feel today?"). A daily mood measure would provide an unbiased time sample of feelings which are representative for a normal day of the group to which the employed or unemployed participants belong (Gärling, 2019;Olsson et al, 2017), 1 and since not being associated with specified activities, it may give different results for emotional well-being than the DRM in previous research. We also ask the participants to rate their mood during the past week in order to obtain a measure of emotional well-being that may be less influenced by extraneous factors than daily mood measures may be.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, we developed a novel Primacy model that we pitted against the standard Recency model. We then also examine a host of other plausible models as suggested in disparate literatures about valuation timing 16,17 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%