Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icgpr.2014.6970524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current limits for high precision GPR measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[76,77]. Since it is a sandy aquifer, low infiltration was not a factor in the long responsive time of the WTD to the P-E [78,79].…”
Section: Correlation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[76,77]. Since it is a sandy aquifer, low infiltration was not a factor in the long responsive time of the WTD to the P-E [78,79].…”
Section: Correlation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these developments have stimulated researches to improve in situ SWC monitoring especially through timelapse or 4D acquisitions. Recent studies (e.g., [7][8]) have shown the abilities of these new techniques to monitor dynamic hydrological processes and specific transient spatial changes in SWC in simple geological contexts (i.e., sandy formations).…”
Section: Multi-frequency and High-resolution Gprmentioning
confidence: 99%