2022
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.28200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current immunoassays and detection of antibodies elicited by Omicron SARS‐CoV‐2 infection

Abstract: The present study aimed to determine whether current commercial immunoassays are adequate for detecting anti‐Omicron antibodies. We analyzed the anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 antibody response of 23 unvaccinated individuals 1–2 months after an Omicron infection. All blood samples were tested with a live virus neutralization assay using a clinical Omicron BA.1 strain and four commercial SARS‐CoV‐2 immunoassays. We assessed three anti‐Spike immunoassays (SARS‐CoV‐2 IgG II Quant [Abbott S], Wantaï anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 antibody ELIS… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, to evaluate the precise levels of binding antibodies to RBD of specific VoCs, a method such as an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using specific RBD of the variants is needed during the variant-dominant period. However, this method limits testing to special laboratories, and the available commercial anti-spike immunoassay displayed 65.2–69.6% detection rates for anti-Omicron antibodies, compared to live virus neutralization assays [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, to evaluate the precise levels of binding antibodies to RBD of specific VoCs, a method such as an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using specific RBD of the variants is needed during the variant-dominant period. However, this method limits testing to special laboratories, and the available commercial anti-spike immunoassay displayed 65.2–69.6% detection rates for anti-Omicron antibodies, compared to live virus neutralization assays [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ELISA total values are expressed in BAU/mL, and with an assigned cutoff at 7.14 BAU/mL, as previously described [ 19 , 20 ]. The SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay (Abbott Nuc) was used to detect anti-Nuc antibodies using a threshold fixed at 1.4 [ 21 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commercial assays developed early during the pandemic are based on ancestral/wild-type antigens. Subsequently, there is potential for differential performance in the Omicron-era: in particular, S-and RBD-specific immunoassays have shown significantly reduced performance (112)(113)(114), and decreased comparability of quantitative results (115).…”
Section: Commercial High-throughput Immunoassaysmentioning
confidence: 99%