2019
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i28.3738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current approaches to the management of patients with cirrhotic ascites

Abstract: This review describes current approaches to the management of patients with cirrhotic ascites in relation to the severity of its clinical manifestations. The PubMed database, the Google Scholar retrieval system, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the reference lists from related articles were used to search for relevant publications. Articles corresponding to the aim of the review were selected for 1991-2018 using the keywords: “liver cirrhosis,” “portal hypertension,” “ascites,” “pathogenesis,” … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
20
1
17

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
(120 reference statements)
1
20
1
17
Order By: Relevance
“…A retrospective cohort study of consecutive US veterans, ages 20–80 years, with cirrhosis and a diagnosis of SBP during hospitalization over a 13‐year period (1 July 2005 to 1 July 2018) was performed at this single VA Medical Center. Inclusion criteria were: (i) diagnosis of cirrhosis by ICD‐9 and ICD‐10 codes or index history and physical exam (H&P) note, with ascites noted on index H&P exam; (ii) SBP based on peritoneal fluid analysis (ascitic fluid absolute neutrophil count [ANC] of ≥250 cells per mm 3 ); and (iii) admission for cirrhosis‐related complications (bleed, encephalopathy, worsening ascites, liver mass, or portal vein thrombosis) or nonspecific symptoms, including fever, tachycardia, leukocytosis, and hypotension. Exclusion criteria included: (i) admission for a noncirrhosis‐related etiology (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A retrospective cohort study of consecutive US veterans, ages 20–80 years, with cirrhosis and a diagnosis of SBP during hospitalization over a 13‐year period (1 July 2005 to 1 July 2018) was performed at this single VA Medical Center. Inclusion criteria were: (i) diagnosis of cirrhosis by ICD‐9 and ICD‐10 codes or index history and physical exam (H&P) note, with ascites noted on index H&P exam; (ii) SBP based on peritoneal fluid analysis (ascitic fluid absolute neutrophil count [ANC] of ≥250 cells per mm 3 ); and (iii) admission for cirrhosis‐related complications (bleed, encephalopathy, worsening ascites, liver mass, or portal vein thrombosis) or nonspecific symptoms, including fever, tachycardia, leukocytosis, and hypotension. Exclusion criteria included: (i) admission for a noncirrhosis‐related etiology (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Pathogenetically based approach to the choice of pharmacotherapy and optimization of minimal invasive treatment may improve the quality of life and increase the survival rate. 2 The key to successful management of patients with ascites may be the stratification of the risk of an adverse outcome and personalized therapy.3 Cirrhosis is the most common cause of ascites in the Western world (75%), followed by peritoneal malignancy (12%), heart failure (5%), and peritoneal tuberculosis (2%). 3 Cardiomyopathies are not very common diseases, but may cause severe complications, making a substantial contribution to maternal morbidity and mortality during pregnancy, in the immediate peripartum period, and up to months later.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…diuretic administration, peritoneal ports, and transhepatic portosystemic shunting (TIPS)), these interventions have been shown to offer limited palliation benefits, while conveying risk for infection and/or potentially further decreasing quality of life. 2 -6 Alternatively, ultrasound-guided palliative paracentesis is a demonstrated safe and effective method for the management of patients with symptomatic ascites, but traditionally requires the patient be transferred to an acute care setting equipped to perform the procedure (i.e. emergency department (ED), inpatient unit, or outpatient interventional radiology (IR) suite).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%