2021
DOI: 10.1080/1061186x.2020.1867991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current approaches and future prospects of nanofibers: a special focus on antimicrobial drug delivery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings were consistent with some reports indicating an inverse relationship between electrical conductivity and viscosity. 42 Moreover, normal fiber diameter distribution suggested the achievement of favorable electrospinning conditions. Meanwhile, the minor diameter was obtained in the case of Chitosan nanofibers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings were consistent with some reports indicating an inverse relationship between electrical conductivity and viscosity. 42 Moreover, normal fiber diameter distribution suggested the achievement of favorable electrospinning conditions. Meanwhile, the minor diameter was obtained in the case of Chitosan nanofibers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significance of optimizing the release of active constituents from nanofiber architectures cannot be disputed, and for a suitable continuous release target, burst release must be carefully regulated. Layer-by-layer technologies, the incorporation of a hydrophobic and hydrophilic polymer into the framework of nanofibers, and the notion of composite nanofibers have all been investigated to optimize the release characteristic of nanofibers . Thus, some of the challenges associated with these systems include scaling up the technology, producing affordable formulations, tailoring the quantity of drug loading, and regulating the shape and porosity of nanofibers for product uniformity .…”
Section: Challenges and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Less invasive intranasal administration can overcome the BBB and be used for targeting CNS diseases 184 ; cell-penetrating peptide-mediated delivery systems will be useful for this purpose. Additionally, local delivery of miRNAs via viral vectors or nanofibers seems more efficient and less toxic in treating early-stage cancers, whereas for metastatic cancer, more stable and less immunogenic delivery vehicles with high affinity and specificity for cancer sites elicit better responses 63,185 . Furthermore, the use of "cocktail" carriers or multiple simultaneous approaches may increase the transfer efficiency of miRNAs to target cells.…”
Section: Challenges and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%