2021
DOI: 10.1063/5.0048886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Curie–Weiss behavior of the low-temperature paramagnetic susceptibility of semiconductors doped and compensated with hydrogen-like impurities

Abstract: For the first time, a quantitative model of the Curie–Weiss behavior of a low-temperature paramagnetic susceptibility of electrically neutral donors in n-type diamagnetic covalent semiconductors is proposed. The exchange interaction between nearest two neutral donors was calculated with the use of the Heitler–London model. In this model, we take into account the change in the thermal ionization energy of donors due to the shift of the bottom of the conduction band to the bandgap with doping and compensation. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to [89], the energy of the exchange interaction of uncompensated spins is J = 2k B Θ/z, where k B is the Boltzmann constant. For the number of geometric neighbors in a random system z ≈ 15.47 [90] and the Curie-Weiss temperature Θ = 150 K (at which the magnetic moment of irradiated diamond is zero; see Figure 5), we have J ≈ 1.7 meV.…”
Section: Magnetic Properties Of Diamonds Irradiated With Fast Neutronsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [89], the energy of the exchange interaction of uncompensated spins is J = 2k B Θ/z, where k B is the Boltzmann constant. For the number of geometric neighbors in a random system z ≈ 15.47 [90] and the Curie-Weiss temperature Θ = 150 K (at which the magnetic moment of irradiated diamond is zero; see Figure 5), we have J ≈ 1.7 meV.…”
Section: Magnetic Properties Of Diamonds Irradiated With Fast Neutronsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mobility edge E c ð Þ m (see Figure 2), for the concentration of c-band electrons n ( Kð1 À KÞN d , is [28,29]…”
Section: The Main Relationships Of the Proposed Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mobility edge E m ( italicc ) (see Figure 2), for the concentration of c ‐band electrons n K ( 1 K ) N normald , is [ 28,29 ] E m ( italicc ) = δ E c = E per ( italicc ) + E res < 0 where E per ( italicc ) = 0.955 W n < 0 is the percolation threshold (energy level) for the diffusion of c ‐band electrons; W n is the root‐mean‐square (rms) fluctuation of the potential energy of c ‐band electron; E res = I normald a n / R im < 0 is the decrease of donor thermal‐ionization energy due to the confinement of the maximum radius of “optical” electron orbit around donor‐ion core due to the presence of other impurities in crystal; I normald = e 2 / 8 π ε normalr ε 0 a n is the ionization energy of a single (isolated) donor with the Bohr radius a n of electron orbit in n ‐type crystal; E res 1.612 ( e 2 / 8 π ε normalr ε 0 ) [ ( 1 + K ) N normald ] 1 / 3 . The quantity δ E c > 0 is due to the formation of a quasi‐continuous band of delocalized electronic states from the excited states of donors below the bottom of...…”
Section: The Main Relationships Of the Proposed Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decrease in the thermal ionization energy of the hydrogen-like acceptor due to the confinement of the maximum Bohr radius of the hole orbit on the acceptor is given by the formula [21,22]…”
Section: General Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%