1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19970315)79:6<1241::aid-cncr25>3.0.co;2-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cure of recurrent medulloblastoma

Abstract: Reoperation of recurrent brain tumors has received surprisingly little attention in the medical literature. Yet, as this case and a review of the literature demonstrate, this is a useful intervention.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Surgery at recurrence did not appear to impact OS, although it remains an important option in well-selected cases, with anecdotal evidence supporting its use. 35 Importantly, our data suggest that the treatment plan should be decided in the context of systematic restaging, given the high probability of out-of-field or leptomeningeal metastasis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Surgery at recurrence did not appear to impact OS, although it remains an important option in well-selected cases, with anecdotal evidence supporting its use. 35 Importantly, our data suggest that the treatment plan should be decided in the context of systematic restaging, given the high probability of out-of-field or leptomeningeal metastasis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Multiple case series suggest that re-resection is associated with prolonged survival. 14 Re-irradiation especially as fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy or radiosurgery seems to result in good local control rates with 65% 1-year survival in one study. 15 But the cumulative toxicity from re-irradiation especially brain radionecrosis can be a limiting factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In a more recent analysis by Gupta et al, however, no significant impact of re-resection on the survival of patients treated with RT2 was found [ 28 ]. Other studies have also shown benefits of treating patients with re-resection when possible [ 29 ]. In our cohort, the patients showed no additional survival benefit when they were treated with both RT2 and resection compared to only RT2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%