2018
DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CUP Syndrome

Abstract: SummaryBackground: 2-4% of newly diagnosed cases of malignant disease involve cancer of unknown primary (CUP). This mixed entity is one of the 6 most common types of malignant disease in Germany. Highly refined treatment strategies can now be offered to patients with CUP.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) is defined as a biopsy-proven metastasis from a malignant disease without a detectable primary site after complete clinical and radiological examinations [ 1 ]. The “CUP syndrome” occurs when metastatic cells have spread from the unknown primary site to multiple organs, with a 2-year survival rate of 20% [ 2 , 3 ]. This complex clinical entity accounts for approximately 2–4% of newly diagnosed cancers, commonly manifesting itself as metastases to the lymph nodes, followed by the liver, bone, and skin [ 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) is defined as a biopsy-proven metastasis from a malignant disease without a detectable primary site after complete clinical and radiological examinations [ 1 ]. The “CUP syndrome” occurs when metastatic cells have spread from the unknown primary site to multiple organs, with a 2-year survival rate of 20% [ 2 , 3 ]. This complex clinical entity accounts for approximately 2–4% of newly diagnosed cancers, commonly manifesting itself as metastases to the lymph nodes, followed by the liver, bone, and skin [ 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm for a CUP syndrome from OBC is based on its clinical presentation and on its histological and immunohistochemical analyses [ 6 , 7 ]. These patients should undergo basic breast diagnostics (i.e., bilateral mammography and breast ultrasound [US]), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast [ 8 ], and positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) with 2-deoxy-2-[ 18 F]fluoro-D-glucose ( 18 F-FDG) [ 3 ]. In particular, MRI of the breast allows the diagnosis of an OBC in about 75% of women with CUP syndrome [ 9 ], and 18 F-FDG-PET/CT identifies the primary tumor in 25–40% of these cases [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some guidelines, 18 F-FDG-PET/CT is used only as an additional supplement to routine tests. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] (Lee2015) (Roh 2009)(Kwee2010) (Kwee2009)(Taylor2012)(Fizazi 2015)(Zaun2018)Yu et al in a large study involving 449 patients, found that PET/CT scans accurately detected the primary tumor in 115 patients, which inspired the use of PET/CT studies in patients at an early stage of diagnosis. (Yu 2016)However, it has also been argued that despite statistical evidence that PET/CT is a better tool for identifying the origin of cancer than MRI (22-44% vs. 20-27%).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A diagnosis of CUP is evocated when the clinical picture of metastatic disease is associated with one or more tissue biopsy results that are inconsistent with a determined primary tumor. Two to four percent of newly diagnosed cases of carcinoma are CUP 3 ; histological subtypes of these CUP are adenocarcinomas (40–60%), undifferentiated carcinomas (15–30%), and SCCs (15–20%) 4 . Patients with CUP syndrome have a median survival of 8–11 months and only 25% survive at 1 year 5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%