2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cumulative impacts of residential rainwater harvesting on stormwater discharge through a peri-urban drainage network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1% 14% 26% 7% 5% 21% 34% 6% 6% 20% 31% 5% 7% 15% 30% 5% Gdańsk 2% 21% 48% 9% 12% 25% 42% 6% 8% 19% 30% 5% 2% 12% 25% 5% Gorzów Wlkp. 5% 16% 32% 7% 9% 23% 39% 8% 11% 20% 32% 5% 6% 15% 23% 4% Katowice 2% 10% 27% 6% 5% 16% 30% 5% 10% 18% 28% 5% 6% 16% 27% 5% Kielce 0% 14% 33% 7% 5% 19% 31% 6% 11% 21% 33% 5% 6% 16% 30% 5% Koszalin 1% 11% 29% 6% 7% 16% 34% 5% 9% 17% 28% 5% 6% 15% 23% 4% Kraków 2% 12% 28% 6% 6% 19% 35% 6% 9% 20% 33% 6% 6% 16% 25% 5% Lublin 4% 16% 34% 7% 11% 22% 35% 6% 10% 20% 34% 5% 6% 15% 24% 4% Łódź 3% 15% 31% 7% 6% 21% 31% 6% 9% 22% 31% 5% 5% 16% 28% 5% Olsztyn 1% 12% 27% 6% 6% 20% 39% 7% 9% 19% 28% 5% 5% 15% 26% 4% Opole 3% 15% 31% 7% 8% 21% 40% 7% 8% 20% 32% 6% 7% 14% 27% 5% Poznań 6% 18% 36% 9% 13% 25% 37% 6% 11% 22% 34% 5% 2% 14% 25% 6% Rzeszów 1% 13% 33% 7% 9% 21% 44% 7% 9% 20% 36% 6% 6% 14% 25% 5% Suwałki 2% 13% 25% 6% 5% 21% 39% 6% 6% 19% 30% 6% 8% 16% 26% 4% Szczecin 2% 16% 41% 8% 8% 21% 34% 6% 9% 21% 36% 6% 7% 15% 25% 4% The annual fraction with 20-day cumulative rainfalls according to the class intervals of [0-10) mm, [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] mm, [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] mm, and [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] mm was calculated and summarised in Table 3. The annual average frequency of periods with a 20-day cumulative rain between [0-10) mm ranged from 10% for Katowice to 21% for Gdańsk.…”
Section: Precipitation Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…1% 14% 26% 7% 5% 21% 34% 6% 6% 20% 31% 5% 7% 15% 30% 5% Gdańsk 2% 21% 48% 9% 12% 25% 42% 6% 8% 19% 30% 5% 2% 12% 25% 5% Gorzów Wlkp. 5% 16% 32% 7% 9% 23% 39% 8% 11% 20% 32% 5% 6% 15% 23% 4% Katowice 2% 10% 27% 6% 5% 16% 30% 5% 10% 18% 28% 5% 6% 16% 27% 5% Kielce 0% 14% 33% 7% 5% 19% 31% 6% 11% 21% 33% 5% 6% 16% 30% 5% Koszalin 1% 11% 29% 6% 7% 16% 34% 5% 9% 17% 28% 5% 6% 15% 23% 4% Kraków 2% 12% 28% 6% 6% 19% 35% 6% 9% 20% 33% 6% 6% 16% 25% 5% Lublin 4% 16% 34% 7% 11% 22% 35% 6% 10% 20% 34% 5% 6% 15% 24% 4% Łódź 3% 15% 31% 7% 6% 21% 31% 6% 9% 22% 31% 5% 5% 16% 28% 5% Olsztyn 1% 12% 27% 6% 6% 20% 39% 7% 9% 19% 28% 5% 5% 15% 26% 4% Opole 3% 15% 31% 7% 8% 21% 40% 7% 8% 20% 32% 6% 7% 14% 27% 5% Poznań 6% 18% 36% 9% 13% 25% 37% 6% 11% 22% 34% 5% 2% 14% 25% 6% Rzeszów 1% 13% 33% 7% 9% 21% 44% 7% 9% 20% 36% 6% 6% 14% 25% 5% Suwałki 2% 13% 25% 6% 5% 21% 39% 6% 6% 19% 30% 6% 8% 16% 26% 4% Szczecin 2% 16% 41% 8% 8% 21% 34% 6% 9% 21% 36% 6% 7% 15% 25% 4% The annual fraction with 20-day cumulative rainfalls according to the class intervals of [0-10) mm, [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] mm, [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] mm, and [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] mm was calculated and summarised in Table 3. The annual average frequency of periods with a 20-day cumulative rain between [0-10) mm ranged from 10% for Katowice to 21% for Gdańsk.…”
Section: Precipitation Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The annual average frequency of periods with a 20-day cumulative rain between [0-10) mm ranged from 10% for Katowice to 21% for Gdańsk. In the case of the interval between [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] mm, the smallest average found was 16% (Katowice and Koszalin), while a highest equal to 25% found in three cities: Gdańsk, Poznań and Toruń. For the interval between [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] mm, the average fraction of the year ranged from 17% (Koszalin) to 22% (Łódź and Poznań).…”
Section: Precipitation Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They also proposed rainwater control in the Perdido River area of Florida, USA using green infrastructure and rainwater harvesting technology. Rainwater discharges in all study areas have been reduced by more than 20% [5].Mora-Melia Daniel, Lopez-Aburto Carlos S, Ballesteros-Perez Pablo et al, using the Rainwater Control Model (SWMM) software for hydrological modeling, considered rainfall runoff in different spatial regions, using different areas of green roofs controlling rainfall runoff; this method provided a useful solution to combat flooding in the Chilean region [6]. Yazdi, J proposed an elastic-based repair method for improving urban drainage systems and applied it to the Rainwater Drainage System (TSDS) in western Tehran, which integrates a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA) and an EPA-SWMM simulation model; this was done to find cost-effective recovery measures during structural failures of key elements in the network [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%