1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf02393721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cumulative environmental change: Conceptual frameworks, evaluation approaches, and institutional perspectives

Abstract: / Cumulative environmental change or cumulative effects may result from the additive effect of individual actions of the same nature or the interactive effect of multiple actions of a different nature. This article reviews conceptual frameworks of cumulative environmental change and describes analytical and institutional approaches to cumulative effects assessment (CEA). A causal model is a common theoretical construct, although the frameworks vary in their emphasis on different components of the model. Two br… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
14

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
34
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the subjectivity of decisions made in the CEA process, complexity and uncertainty are fundamental difficulties, commonly invoked to describe, for example, the diversity of biological and physical land-use effects, stressor interactions, spatial and temporal lags between stressors and effects, nonlinear relationships, and positive and negative feedback loops (Spaling and Smit 1993;Therivel and Ross 2007;Seitz et al 2011;Ball et al 2013). In Hegmann and Yarranton's (2011) pessimistic assessment, "even if practitioners employ the most advanced and complex analysis and the best that analytical thought may offer (CEA) still delivers just words and numbers buried within limitations, assumptions and uncertainties" (Hegmann and Yarranton 2011).…”
Section: Table 2 (Concluded)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the subjectivity of decisions made in the CEA process, complexity and uncertainty are fundamental difficulties, commonly invoked to describe, for example, the diversity of biological and physical land-use effects, stressor interactions, spatial and temporal lags between stressors and effects, nonlinear relationships, and positive and negative feedback loops (Spaling and Smit 1993;Therivel and Ross 2007;Seitz et al 2011;Ball et al 2013). In Hegmann and Yarranton's (2011) pessimistic assessment, "even if practitioners employ the most advanced and complex analysis and the best that analytical thought may offer (CEA) still delivers just words and numbers buried within limitations, assumptions and uncertainties" (Hegmann and Yarranton 2011).…”
Section: Table 2 (Concluded)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This framework is based on widely accepted EIA procedures and was initially applied within North America, Europe and Australia (Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, 1999; Council on Environmental Quality, 1997; Spaling and Smit, 1993).…”
Section: Assessment Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cumulative Impact Assessments (CIAs), the process of systematically analysing, evaluating or predicting cumulative environmental change (Spaling and Smit, 1993), are an integral tool in EIAs. Cumulative impacts can be assessed by either:…”
Section: Risk Analysis and Prioritizationmentioning
confidence: 99%