1986
DOI: 10.1177/002199838602000202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cumulative Damage Models and Multi-Stress Fatigue Life Prediction

Abstract: Cumulative damage during fatigue is studied analytically. Extensive reviews are per formed on the published damage models. Three different cumulative damage models are defined using several physical variables such as fatigue modulus and resultant strain. Proposed model I is defined using fatigue modulus, while models II and III are defined using resultant strains. Proposed models are derived as functions of nor malized applied stress level, r, and number of fatigue cycle, n. It is verified that the proposed cu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
116
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 247 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
116
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the next damage propagation phase, the stiffness continues to decrease gradually, ranging from a few percent for unidirectionally reinforced carbon composites to several tens of percents for multidirectional glass laminates [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Furthermore, most onedimensional damage models for fibre-reinforced composites only account for the effect of damage on the stiffness [5,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. As such, the main focus in the fatigue experiments described here is on the expected stiffness degradation and permanent deformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the next damage propagation phase, the stiffness continues to decrease gradually, ranging from a few percent for unidirectionally reinforced carbon composites to several tens of percents for multidirectional glass laminates [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Furthermore, most onedimensional damage models for fibre-reinforced composites only account for the effect of damage on the stiffness [5,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. As such, the main focus in the fatigue experiments described here is on the expected stiffness degradation and permanent deformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, most of these models ignore basic observability of their damage states (i.e., crack length) in practical, real-life situations (e.g., when the direct measurement of a crack size is impossible or impractical). Secondly, almost all statistical (cycle counting) damage models gloss over the role that the initial damage state has on the true life cycle of structures [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical analysis begins by assuming that fatigue damage is being induced by applying a dynamic stress level r under constant frequency, temperature, moisture content, etc. conditions [13]. In this case the darnage D can be written as a fhnction of the applied stress level r and the number of fatigue cycles,…”
Section: Wear-out Approach For Predicting Remaining Lifetimementioning
confidence: 99%