2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2013
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2013.319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cumulative Attribute Space for Age and Crowd Density Estimation

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
256
2
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 412 publications
(260 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
256
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is exactly what helps accuracy for subtle, fine-grained comparisons, and, to some extent, mitigates the impact of inconsistent training comparisons. For an application requiring a full ordering of many images, one could feed our predictions to a rank aggregation technique [10], or apply a second layer of learning to normalize them, as in [9,11,23]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is exactly what helps accuracy for subtle, fine-grained comparisons, and, to some extent, mitigates the impact of inconsistent training comparisons. For an application requiring a full ordering of many images, one could feed our predictions to a rank aggregation technique [10], or apply a second layer of learning to normalize them, as in [9,11,23]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, by not insisting on a single global function to relate all images, we mitigate the impact of inconsistencies in visual comparisons. To our knowledge, no prior work specifically explores fine-grained visual comparisons, and all prior methods assume a single global function is sufficient [9,11,21,23,28]. Furthermore, while local learning methods have been explored for classification [2,6,17,31,33] and information retrieval problems [3,13,16,24], our idea for learning local ranking functions with comparisons is new.…”
Section: > ?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Crowd counting: Various approaches to crowd counting have been proposed [21], including counting-bydetection [20,39,12], counting-by-clustering [6,29], and counting-by-regression [9,10,19,7]. The latter is favoured by most recent studies due to its robustness against occlusion.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Counting in crowded public spaces is non-trivial due to severe inter-object occlusion, scene perspective distortion, and visual ambiguity introduced by challenging lighting condition and complex human activities. State-of-the-art methods [9,10,19,7] typically adopt regression-based techniques to learn a mapping between low-level features and people count, so as to circumvent explicit object segmentation and detection in crowded scenes. However, these techniques generally require exhaustive frame-wise labelling or even exact head-position annotations [19] to train a regression model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%