2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2014.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Culture supernatants of different colon cancer cell lines induce specific phenotype switching and functional alteration of THP-1 cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the past few years a revision of the strict M1/M2 model was suggested and a continuum of macrophage phenotypes ranging between the two extremes of pro- (M1) and anti-inflammatory (M2) types was proposed [ 12 ]. Our results are comparable to other studies on macrophage polarization using cytokines, tumour cells or tumour cell supernatants [ 11 ]. CD40 and IL-6, markers characteristic for M1 macrophages, were significantly elevated in IFN-γ/LPS polarized macrophages and the scavenger receptors CD36 and CD206, referred to M2, were significantly higher expressed in IL-4/IL-13 treated macrophages.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In the past few years a revision of the strict M1/M2 model was suggested and a continuum of macrophage phenotypes ranging between the two extremes of pro- (M1) and anti-inflammatory (M2) types was proposed [ 12 ]. Our results are comparable to other studies on macrophage polarization using cytokines, tumour cells or tumour cell supernatants [ 11 ]. CD40 and IL-6, markers characteristic for M1 macrophages, were significantly elevated in IFN-γ/LPS polarized macrophages and the scavenger receptors CD36 and CD206, referred to M2, were significantly higher expressed in IL-4/IL-13 treated macrophages.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…M2 (tumor-associated) macrophages, when present in TME, correspond with a poor prognosis in several cancers, including tongue cancer [ 4 , 26 , 27 ]. Cancer cells through the conditioned media can polarize primary macrophages and the human monocytic cell line (THP-1) towards M2 [ 28 , 29 ]. We investigated whether this polarization effect could also be achieved using cancer cell EVs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The communication of macrophages with cancer cells, and how both populations influence each other, has been explored by several studies, at both cellular and molecular levels. Most of those in vitro studies rely on two main strategies, direct [ 31 , 32 ] or indirect [ 33 35 ] macrophage-cancer cell co-cultures or, alternatively, stimulation of one population with the supernatant of the other [ 36 , 32 , 37 ]. The preferential methodological approach seems to be indirect macrophage-cancer cell co-cultures, as this constitutes a simple and practical in vitro model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preferential methodological approach seems to be indirect macrophage-cancer cell co-cultures, as this constitutes a simple and practical in vitro model. These studies also frequently use macrophage-like cells differentiated from THP-1 human monocytes [ 33 , 35 , 36 ], upon stimulation with phorbol myristate acetate (PMA), although these are not completely representative of primary human macrophages [ 38 ]. Although the knowledge about macrophage-cancer cell communication has improved in the last years, there is scarce information on how ionizing radiation may modulate macrophage inflammatory profile and how the molecular crosstalk established between macrophages and cancer cells affects the radiation response of both populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%