2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intricate Macrophage-Colorectal Cancer Cell Communication in Response to Radiation

Abstract: Both cancer and tumour-associated host cells are exposed to ionizing radiation when a tumour is subjected to radiotherapy. Macrophages frequently constitute the most abundant tumour-associated immune population, playing a role in tumour progression and response to therapy. The present work aimed to evaluate the importance of macrophage-cancer cell communication in the cellular response to radiation. To address this question, we established monocultures and indirect co-cultures of human monocyte-derived macroph… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(77 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The irradiation in the coculture with radiosensitive cells prompted the decrease of proinflammatory markers (CXCL8, CCR7, IL1β) while anti-inflammatory marker expression was not affected. In the coculture with radio-resistant cells, proinflammatory (CD80, CCR7) and anti-inflammatory (CCL18, IL10) markers were upregulated, these findings suggest that the interaction with different cancer cell types can affect the macrophage phenotype [103].…”
Section: Intermediate Dosesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The irradiation in the coculture with radiosensitive cells prompted the decrease of proinflammatory markers (CXCL8, CCR7, IL1β) while anti-inflammatory marker expression was not affected. In the coculture with radio-resistant cells, proinflammatory (CD80, CCR7) and anti-inflammatory (CCL18, IL10) markers were upregulated, these findings suggest that the interaction with different cancer cell types can affect the macrophage phenotype [103].…”
Section: Intermediate Dosesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Pinto et al investigated the relationship between TAMs and cancer cells in co-cultures of different cancer cell lines. Although their results showed different responses for different cancer cell lines, the overall output from their study was that TAMs were definitely in contact with cancer cells and they even might regulate metabolism, gene expression and cytokine production under IR and overall radiation response of cancer cells 230. Fortunately, IR shifts the pro-tumor effects predominance to anti-tumor side.…”
Section: Radiation Induced Immune-targetable Elementsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Potential downregulated genes were involved in nervous system development, RNA polymerase II transcription factor activity, sequence-specific DNA binding, and nucleoplasm. Pinto et al [28] indicated that there is a complicated cell communication in response to ionizing radiation revealed by primary human macrophage-cancer cell culture. Kim et al [29] reported that IFITM1 expression was positively correlated with galectin-3 via receptor signaling protein activity in human colon cancer cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%