2016
DOI: 10.1111/disa.12203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Culture, local capacity, and outside aid: a community perspective on disaster response after the 2009 tsunami in American Sāmoa

Abstract: Research on diverse cultural contexts has indicated that aid organisations often fail to leverage local, culturally-grounded resources and capacities in disaster-affected communities. Case-study methodology was employed to explore the relationship between local and external disaster response efforts in American Sāmoa following the earthquake and tsunami on 29 September 2009 in the southern Pacific Ocean, with a specific focus on the role of culture in defining that relationship. Interview and focus group data … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Declines in social embeddedness and activities at a community level ( support deterioration ).28. Binder and Baker () Community members, para‐professional counsellors, and government representatives interviewed about local and external disaster efforts. (Same sample as 27)Event: South Pacific tsunami, September 2009 Country: American Samoa Age: adults Sample size: 43 Sampling: non‐random Diversity: 74 per cent female; SamoansMethod: Interviews and focus groups Time: between 15 and 16 months after (a second visit took place 39 months after) Support themes: instantaneous local support mobilisation; outside aid and cultural disruption Aid emerged promptly through culturally established ways (local leaders/heads of families, extended family). Family living outside of the territory, local organisations, and churches were active in helping ( altruistic community ).…”
Section: Annexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Declines in social embeddedness and activities at a community level ( support deterioration ).28. Binder and Baker () Community members, para‐professional counsellors, and government representatives interviewed about local and external disaster efforts. (Same sample as 27)Event: South Pacific tsunami, September 2009 Country: American Samoa Age: adults Sample size: 43 Sampling: non‐random Diversity: 74 per cent female; SamoansMethod: Interviews and focus groups Time: between 15 and 16 months after (a second visit took place 39 months after) Support themes: instantaneous local support mobilisation; outside aid and cultural disruption Aid emerged promptly through culturally established ways (local leaders/heads of families, extended family). Family living outside of the territory, local organisations, and churches were active in helping ( altruistic community ).…”
Section: Annexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corporate culture has been preferably discussed in the previous literature, as in the organizations' working environment the tasks are being done through organizational culture. Furthermore, it is evident that culture is a dynamic force which develops the environmental settings through its strong relationship with humans (Binder & Baker, 2017). The concerned dimensions of organizational culture in this study are tight versus loose control culture, which is explained by Hofstede (1998) Tight control culture is purely and extremely cost conscious in nature.…”
Section: H1mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Corporate culture has been preferably discussed in the previous literature, as in the organizations' working environment the tasks are being done through organizational culture. Furthermore, it is evident that culture is a dynamic force which develops the environmental settings through its strong relationship with humans (Binder & Baker, 2017). The concerned dimensions of organizational culture in this study are tight versus loose control culture, which is explained by Hofstede (1998)but parts of organizations may have distinct subcultures.…”
Section: H1mentioning
confidence: 76%