2022
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4114598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Culture, Gender, and Financial Literacy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is supported by descriptive analysis in the paper. The finding supports other recent literature documenting the relationship between gender culture and financial literacy (Bottazzi & Lusardi, 2021; Davoli & Rodríguez‐Planas, 2022; Driva et al, 2016; Grohmann & Schoofs, 2021; Rink et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is supported by descriptive analysis in the paper. The finding supports other recent literature documenting the relationship between gender culture and financial literacy (Bottazzi & Lusardi, 2021; Davoli & Rodríguez‐Planas, 2022; Driva et al, 2016; Grohmann & Schoofs, 2021; Rink et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Culture (capturing gendered structures, norms and stereotypes) is amongst the newer explanations for gender differences in financial literacy (Bottazzi & Lusardi, 2021; Davoli & Rodríguez‐Planas, 2022; Driva et al, 2016;Grohmann & Schoofs, 2021; Rink et al, 2021). Rink et al (2021, p. 131) define culture as “… a system of shared beliefs, values, customs, behaviours and artefacts that the members of a certain society use to interact with their world and with one another” .…”
Section: Gender Culture and Financial Literacymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The first attributes the gap to gender differences in financial decision‐making and differences in the household division of labour (Fonseca et al., 2012; Rao & Malapit, 2015; Hsu, 2016; Ward et al., 2019; Rink et al., 2021). A second, related, explanation emphasises social and cultural factors, including gender roles and gender stereotypes (Shim et al., 2010; Agnew & Cameron‐Agnew, 2015; Driva et al., 2016; Bottazzi & Lusardi, 2021; Grohmann & Schoofs, 2021; Rink et al., 2021; Tinghög et al., 2021; Davoli & Rodriguez‐Planas, 2022; Preston et al., 2023). A third explanation suggests that the gap may arise from gender differences in non‐cognitive factors – personality, self‐confidence, perseverance, risk aversion (Arellano et al., 2017; Longobardi et al., 2018; Robson & Peetz, 2020; Tinghög et al., 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%