2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.intman.2020.100807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Culture, connectedness, and international adoption of disruptive innovation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another research conducted by Zhang et al (2018) examined the motivational disparities between Canadian and Chinese online students by examining the impact of intrinsic motivation on the technology adoption paradigm (TAM); they discovered that, in contrast to Canadians, the effect of perceived utility on desire to use online learning contexts is minimal in the Chinese community. Uzuegbunam and Geringer (2021) examined the decision to use a mobile device by analyzing data from an email survey of 245 Malaysian and 250 Singaporean pre-service teachers. The findings indicate that in both nations, perceived utility, program mindset and perceived ease of use both have a major effect on behavioral aim.…”
Section: Instructors' Online Teaching Competencies and Student's Soci...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another research conducted by Zhang et al (2018) examined the motivational disparities between Canadian and Chinese online students by examining the impact of intrinsic motivation on the technology adoption paradigm (TAM); they discovered that, in contrast to Canadians, the effect of perceived utility on desire to use online learning contexts is minimal in the Chinese community. Uzuegbunam and Geringer (2021) examined the decision to use a mobile device by analyzing data from an email survey of 245 Malaysian and 250 Singaporean pre-service teachers. The findings indicate that in both nations, perceived utility, program mindset and perceived ease of use both have a major effect on behavioral aim.…”
Section: Instructors' Online Teaching Competencies and Student's Soci...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, studies on the impact of socio-cultural factors on digitalisation, innovation and sustainable development have largely confirmed their influence. For example, an extensive study of 47 countries over 14 years revealed that cultural factors significantly impact the adoption of disruptive innovation in the agricultural biotech sector [25]. A similar conclusion was reached in a study showing that socio-cultural factors influence the level of digitalisation in companies within the 27 countries of the European Union [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…This highlights a possible reason why there is disagreement in the literature regarding the innovation paradox concerning the opposing effects of cultural tightness and looseness on innovative behaviours. Uzuegbunam and Geringer (2021) found that culturally loose societies have higher rates of innovation (which requires idea realization) than tight ones. However, Prokopowicz et al (2021) found lower rates of idea implementation from extremely loose and extremely tight cultures, and that a balance between these was optimal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These ideas may require norm breaking and deviance from accepted ways of doing things (Mainemelis, 2010; Mueller et al, 2011). Cultural looseness has been empirically linked to innovation at the national/societal level (Uzuegbunam & Geringer, 2021), in organizations (Ozeren et al, 2013), in innovation networks (Cremer & Loebbecke, 2020) and in work teams (Gedik & Ozbek, 2020).…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%