2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-839x.2007.00235.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cultural significance of leg‐to‐body ratio preferences? Evidence from Britain and rural Malaysia

Abstract: The leg-to-body ratio (LBR) has been suggested as an under-researched aesthetic criterion in humans. In the present study, 54 rural Malaysians and 80 Britons rated for physical attractiveness a set of line drawings that varied in five levels of LBR. The results showed that, for British participants, a higher LBR was preferred in women but a lower LBR was preferred in men. Malaysian participants, in contrast, rated medium female LBR and low male LBR as the most attractive. These results are discussed in terms o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another issue is possible factors influencing leg length preferences. Testing the most obvious hypothesis about Western culture influence has given ambiguous results (Sorokowski et al, 2011;Swami et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another issue is possible factors influencing leg length preferences. Testing the most obvious hypothesis about Western culture influence has given ambiguous results (Sorokowski et al, 2011;Swami et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The first evidence showing significant cross-cultural differences in LBR assessments was by Swami, Einon, and Furnham (2007). British participants preferred a higher LBR in women but a lower LBR in men.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[ 31 ]). Early studies indicated that men with low LBRs are more attractive [ 32 , 33 ], but more recent studies have found that average [ 34 , 35 ] or above-average [ 31 , 36 ] proportions are preferable. Other research has found that optimum male LBR varies cross-culturally [ 37 ], with no detectable preference at all in some cases [ 38 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies of the link between limb proportions and attractiveness have focused on leg-to-body ratio (LBR), defined as the ratio of total leg length to total height. Two early papers reported a preference for low LBRs [ 17 , 18 ], but these experiments used line-drawn figures with anatomical distortions in the hands, feet and crotch introduced through crude image-manipulation techniques. Subsequent work has typically used silhouettes based on photographs and has found a preference for average or above-average LBRs [ 19 , 20 ] (see also [ 21 – 23 ]).…”
Section: The Influence Of Leg-to-body Ratio Arm-to-body Ratio and Inmentioning
confidence: 99%