2015
DOI: 10.1177/0018726714561699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cultural identity change in expatriates: A social network perspective

Abstract: We explore relational patterns of expatriates’ social networks and their impact on expatriates’ change in cultural identity while working abroad. We go beyond mono-cultural assumptions and highlight the importance of examining cross-cultural relational dynamics on maintenance and change in expatriates’ cultural identity. We argue that strong ties in dense networks are most conducive to helping expatriates stay attached to a national culture. Cultural diversity in a social network provides the impetus for cultu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
91
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
(183 reference statements)
8
91
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Culturally diverse professional and social networks furthermore enable the process of cosmopolitan identity formation (Colic-Peisker, 2010;Mao and Shen, 2015). Beaverstock …”
Section: Conditions and Social Sites Of Practiced Cosmopolitanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Culturally diverse professional and social networks furthermore enable the process of cosmopolitan identity formation (Colic-Peisker, 2010;Mao and Shen, 2015). Beaverstock …”
Section: Conditions and Social Sites Of Practiced Cosmopolitanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the present day, cultural psychology has developed into a sophisticated field of research with well established theories and methodologies (for a review, see Kitayama & Cohen D., 2007). Some of the particularly notable developments include cultural neuroscience (Chiao, Cheon, Pornpattananangkul, Mrazek, & Blizinsky, 2013; Park & Huang, 2010), investigations of the causes of cultural change (Greenfield, 2013; Trzesniewski & Donnellan, 2010; Twenge, Campbell, & Freeman, 2012; also see Freeman, 2002, and Putnam, 2000), the study of Gene × Culture interaction (Kim & Sasaki, 2012; Kitayama, King, Yoon, Tompson, Huff, & Liberzon, 2014; Luo, Ma, Liu, Li, Wang, Shi, & … Han, 2015), the use of social network analysis to study cultural experience and behavior (Mao & Shen, 2015; Qiu, Lin, & Leung, 2013), and the integration of ecological perspectives to understand origins of cultural variability (Kitayama et al, 2010; Talhelm, Zhang, Oishi, Shimin, Duan, Lan, & Kitayama, 2014). These theoretical and methodological advances have allowed investigators not only to identify but, more importantly, explain and predict group differences.…”
Section: Assumption 1: Cultural Psychology Is Only About Finding Groumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zagenczyk et al (2010) found co-workers with network ties tend to have similar levels of POS, while work on social exchange demonstrates that network position plays a role in employee feelings of obligation toward their employer. Network research has shed light on social influence in a variety of behavioral and attitudinal domains (e.g., Bardon et al, 2015;Mao and Shen, 2015;Vardaman et al, 2012), and integrating social comparisons with a network approach could provide significant theoretical insight into OST by considering how intra-organizational social networks impact POS's relationships with employee attitudes and behaviors.…”
Section: Limitations and Directions For Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%