It is a privilege and honor to have been asked to read and react to the articles in this International Forum of The Counseling Psychologist (TCP). Forum Coeditors Blustein and Leong are to be commended for assembling a solid set of articles that are illustrative of the current state of international counseling psychology and its global world impact. Both Fretz (1999) and Heppner (1999), in their recent reflections as TCP editors, discuss the continuing obstacles to internationalization and globalization of counseling psychology. Progress does seem to have been slow. But there are signs that the foundation for an international room of counseling psychology has been established and that the framing work for the walls has begun.It is interesting that the footings for the foundation were put down in the earliest days of the division. W. Lloyd, E. G. Williamson, D. Super, H. Borow, L. Brammer, and others (Fukuhara, 1989) were called on to be directly involved in the post-World War II reorganization of Japan's educational system. In the mid-1960s, C. Gilbert Wrenn, Frank Robinson, and others responded to Great Britain's initiative to institute counseling and counseling psychology programs in the British educational system. From these earliest beginnings, gains have clearly been made.Nearly 25 years ago, when I was awarded my first Fulbright professorship (J. J. McWhirter, 1983), my professional colleagues were supportive and happy for me, but many could not understand why a counseling psychologist would want to take his family to Turkey for anything other than a brief tourist trip, and some even questioned that. But times have changed; for example, in the last few years, members of my faculty at Arizona State University have traveled professionally