2017
DOI: 10.26458/1724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CULTURAL DUE DILIGENCE IN M&A. IMPORTANCE OF SOFT RISKS FACTORS

Abstract: During the last decades, the corporate world has witnessed a significant rise in the number of cross border mergers and acquisitions (M&As).In

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, this tool should also include an analysis of the impact of macroeconomic factors and take into account the uncertainty factor of the company's external environment. Warter and Warter (2017) identifies the risks associated with the cultural diversity of the companies participating in the transaction as the main risk, proposing due diligence as the main tool to combat them. It is the process of identifying and assessing the degree of cultural alignment or compatibility between companies that are potential parties to a transaction.…”
Section: Financial Payment Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, this tool should also include an analysis of the impact of macroeconomic factors and take into account the uncertainty factor of the company's external environment. Warter and Warter (2017) identifies the risks associated with the cultural diversity of the companies participating in the transaction as the main risk, proposing due diligence as the main tool to combat them. It is the process of identifying and assessing the degree of cultural alignment or compatibility between companies that are potential parties to a transaction.…”
Section: Financial Payment Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stage of analyzing the company's external environment and analyzing candidates for an M&A transaction, in particular, the choice of the target company as the most significant risks is accompanied by the risks of the wrong choice of the target company and the risks of company incompatibility. For example, Warter and Warter (2017) highlights the risk of significant cultural differences between companies; 3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the 1980s, after emergence the concept of strategic HRM, the focus of scholars and consultants have been equally divided on hard issues and SIs (Gomes, Angwin, Peter, & Mellahi, 2012;Pikula, 1999). Dixon (2005) described that culture is a soft notion and organizations should use culture-related surveys and multiple assessment tools to measure and manage the cultural clashes (Dixon, 2005;Walter & Walter, 2017). A practical approach to managing cultural issues is to develop a set of cultural features for all, such as customer-focused, innovative, conclusive, team-based, and respectful (Dixon, 2005).…”
Section: Soft Issues Knowledge Andtechnology Sharing Andtransfer and Fimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effective management of cultural differences, adaptation, and understanding can also help in KTST (Nur, 2012). Walter and Walter (2017) pointed out that managers involved in M&As deals are identified by different cultural factors such as ethnicity, native language, and nationality. Although national and organizational cultural differences are a vital reason behind integration hitches, however, overemphasizing on the cultural differences as a reason for M&As failure by the managers should be noticed (Walter & Walter, 2017).…”
Section: Soft Issues Knowledge Andtechnology Sharing Andtransfer and Firm Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation