1990
DOI: 10.1525/aa.1990.92.1.02a00150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cultural Correlates with Cranial Capacity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(1 reference statement)
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Obviously, NG's claim-that Morton's race differences in brain size (skull size, brain capacity, volume, or however defined) do not exists-is misleading. Morton's findings are in fact supported by empirical evidence from such varied sources as (1) early fossil findings (Beals, Smith and Dodd, 1984) [42]; Smith and Beals, (1990) [41], and (2) Rushton's current findings (1988a, 1988b [44,45], 1992 [33], 1997, 2000 [46,47]; Rushton and Osborne, 1995 [48]). No doubt, Morton misclassified the "cold" North East Asian average skull size by ranking it lower than less cold European ecotypes, perhaps due to incomplete series of specimens.…”
Section: Summary Of the First Syllogistic Analysissupporting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Obviously, NG's claim-that Morton's race differences in brain size (skull size, brain capacity, volume, or however defined) do not exists-is misleading. Morton's findings are in fact supported by empirical evidence from such varied sources as (1) early fossil findings (Beals, Smith and Dodd, 1984) [42]; Smith and Beals, (1990) [41], and (2) Rushton's current findings (1988a, 1988b [44,45], 1992 [33], 1997, 2000 [46,47]; Rushton and Osborne, 1995 [48]). No doubt, Morton misclassified the "cold" North East Asian average skull size by ranking it lower than less cold European ecotypes, perhaps due to incomplete series of specimens.…”
Section: Summary Of the First Syllogistic Analysissupporting
confidence: 56%
“…NG fails to refer to independent available data confirming that North East Asians have-on average-the largest skull average of all races studied (Lynn, 2006(Lynn, /2015 [40]. NG fails to inform the reader about documented geographic differences in prehistoric skull sizes, including an estimated increase in skull volume of 2.5 cm 3 with each degree latitude (Smith and Beals, 1990) [41], after measuring close to 20.000 crania from 87 populations, categorizing them into 10 races, and finding significant race differences (Beals, Smith, and Dodd, 1984) [42]. NG finally fails to call attention to Cold Winter theory (Lynn, 2006(Lynn, /2015(Lynn, , 2008 [40,43], which on theoretical ground predicts, and in practice finds, racial brain size and IQ differences as a reflection of climate, i.e., the colder, the larger or higher.…”
Section: Discussion Of the 4 Minor Premises In The First Syllogistic mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the meantime, Smith and Beals [26] explained the association between cranial capacity and latitude showing larger cranial capacity with more rounded head in people habitat in cold climates. They further emphasised the association between the cranial capacity and body size with large cranial capacity with increasing body size.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a significant – on the order of 8 percent – difference in average brain size between the indigenous people of such ancestry and ethnic Europeans (Jurgens et al. , Smith and Beals ). Again, a consensus is emerging that there are real and substantial differences in average intelligence between the immigrants and the native populations.…”
Section: Psychometrics Biology Evolutionary Psychology and Behaviomentioning
confidence: 99%