Cultural barriers to effective communication between Indigenous communities and health care providers in Northern Argentina: an anthropological contribution to Chagas disease prevention and control

Abstract

IntroductionNinety percent of the aboriginal communities of Argentina are located in areas of endemic vectorial transmission of Chagas disease. Control activities in these communities have not been effective. The goal of this research was to explore the role played by beliefs, habits, and practices of Pilaga and Wichi indigenous communities in their interaction with the local health system in the province of Formosa. This article contributes to the understanding of the cultural barriers that affect the communication process between indigenous peoples and their health care providers.MethodsTwenty-nine open ended interviews were carried out with members of four indigenous communities (Pilaga and Wichi) located in central Formosa. These interviews were used to describe and compare these communities’ approach to health and disease as they pertain to Chagas as well as their perceptions of Western medicine and its incarnation in local health practice.ResultsFive key findings are presented: 1) members of these communities tend to see disease as caused by other people or by the person’s violation of taboos instead of as a biological process; 2) while the Pilaga are more inclined to accept Western medicine, the Wichi often favour the indigenous approach to health care over the Western approach; 3) members of these communities do not associate the vector with the transmission of the disease and they have little awareness of the need for vector control activities; 4) indigenous individuals who undergo diagnostic tests and accept treatment often do so without full information and knowledge; 5) the clinical encounter is rife with conflict between the expectations of health care providers and those of members of these communities.ConclusionOur analysis suggests that there is a need to consider the role of the cultural patterning of health and disease when developing interventions to prevent and control Chagas disease among indigenous communities in Northern Argentina. This is especially important when communicating with these communities about prevention and control. These research findings might also be of value to national and provincial agencies in charge of decreasing the rates of Chagas disease among indigenous populations.

Childhood Vaccine Acceptance and Refusal among Warao Amerindian Caregivers in Venezuela; A Qualitative Approach

“…Other studies, including from South American indigenous populations, have documented that practice of traditional medicine, religious beliefs or a lack of faith in Western medicine may negatively affect decisions around health care and vaccination acceptance [16, 28–31]. Although the majority of Warao caregivers visited traditional healers (68%) and were Christians (71%), a major role of these factors in vaccine decision-making was not identified.…”

Ecological and Sociodemographic Determinants of House Infestation by Triatoma infestans in Indigenous Communities of the Argentine Chaco

“…More knowledge of the drivers of household mobility, migration and the desired types of housing of Qom and other indigenous peoples which had a nomadic or seminomadic tradition are needed. The design of Chagas disease prevention programs and other health interventions directed to indigenous populations should address their specific needs and beliefs [ 80 , 81 ]. Improving housing quality in isolation, while traditional agricultural activities continue in decline and other sources of local employment are rare, may not stop the rural-to-peri-urban exodus across ethnic groups.…”

Landscape Disturbance Impacts on Attalea Butyracea Palm Distribution in Central Panama: Implications for Chagas Disease Transmission

“…Social and ecological drivers in uence not just the risk of Chagas disease transmission, but also the success of preventative vector control. Poor prevention outcomes have been observed, for Chagas disease and other vectorborne diseases more broadly, where planners have failed to understand, for example, the role and burden of women in vector control (72,73), or cultural barriers to successfully engage indigenous communities (74).…”