2005
DOI: 10.1093/ei/cbi004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cultural and Other Barriers to Motion Pictures Trade

Abstract: The global success of the American film industry facing rising costs of production, foreign protectionism, and liberal trade policies at home is an enigma. The basis for American dominance is found in market size and structure. In turn, market characteristics and microdata explain protectionist strategies—leading to a complex gravity‐iceberg model of U.S. exports. Besides purchasing power and spatial distance, cultural variables as well as protectionist strategies are important influences on U.S. motion pictur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent exception has been the literature on international trade in movies. Marvasti and Canterbery (2005) determines cultural distance by applying a gravity-iceberg model to U.S. movie exports. Using a gravity framework as well, Hanson and Xiang (2008) finds market size, language, and trade costs are all important determinants of U.S. movie exports.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent exception has been the literature on international trade in movies. Marvasti and Canterbery (2005) determines cultural distance by applying a gravity-iceberg model to U.S. movie exports. Using a gravity framework as well, Hanson and Xiang (2008) finds market size, language, and trade costs are all important determinants of U.S. movie exports.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such policies could also be used in defense of national cultural production, which is not quite the same thing (Mas-Colell 1999). In this case, a protectionist barrier would limit the advantages of Hollywood movies in terms of English language, stars, popularity or economies of scale (Marvasti and Canterbery 2005). On the other hand, Europe frequently denounces the dumping of Hollywood films, especially given that the Webb-Pomerane Act explicitly permits monopolistic practices in foreign markets (Scott 2002).…”
Section: International Movie Markets and Cultural Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The larger effective markets for the larger countries permit firms in these countries to benefit from scale economies in the production of media products. Hoskins and Mirus (1988), Hoskins and McFayden (1991), Marvasti (1994Marvasti ( , 2000, Marvasti and Canterbery (2005), Waterman (1988), and Wildman and Siwek (1988), among others, provide thorough explorations of this type of model in relation to both film and television markets. In the context of the motion-picture market, this model appears to be an accurate depiction in the pre-1990s period when non-US theatrical revenues were smaller than domestic revenues.…”
Section: International Movie Markets and Cultural Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…He estimates a naive gravity equation with a sample that covers the 49 largest importing countries. Marvasti and Canterbery (2005) investigate the determinants of US motion pictures exports to 33 countries. The estimation of a gravity equation over the period 1991-1995 reveals a positive impact of language, education and religion on exports.…”
Section: Trade In Cultural Goodsmentioning
confidence: 99%