2019
DOI: 10.1094/phyto-09-18-0368-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cultivar Resistance to Common Scab Disease of Potato Is Dependent on the Pathogen Species

Abstract: Common scab of potato is a superficial tuber disease caused by Streptomyces species that produce the phytotoxin thaxtomin. Because common scab development is highly dependent on the effects of this single toxin, the current operating paradigm in common scab pathology is that a potato cultivar resistant to one strain of the common scab pathogen is resistant to all strains. However, cultivar resistance to common scab disease identified in one breeding program is often not durable when tested in other potato bree… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LOD and LOQ were calculated by using six replicates of a single standard as 3.3 and 10 times the standard deviation divided by the slope of the calibration curve for each sugar. 18,22,23 Even though the baseline separations between monosaccharides glucose and galactose (due to high similarities in structures) were not observed in the present study, good calibration data were obtained. Similar challenges for the separation of monosaccharides like glucose and galactose have also been reported in the published literature.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…LOD and LOQ were calculated by using six replicates of a single standard as 3.3 and 10 times the standard deviation divided by the slope of the calibration curve for each sugar. 18,22,23 Even though the baseline separations between monosaccharides glucose and galactose (due to high similarities in structures) were not observed in the present study, good calibration data were obtained. Similar challenges for the separation of monosaccharides like glucose and galactose have also been reported in the published literature.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Precision was measured as relative standard deviation (RSD) by using six replicates (triplicates in two different days; intra- and interday) of the calculated concentrations of each sugar at three different concentrations (0.312, 1.25, and 5 μg/mL). LOD and LOQ were calculated by using six replicates of a single standard as 3.3 and 10 times the standard deviation divided by the slope of the calibration curve for each sugar. ,, Even though the baseline separations between monosaccharides glucose and galactose (due to high similarities in structures) were not observed in the present study, good calibration data were obtained. Similar challenges for the separation of monosaccharides like glucose and galactose have also been reported in the published literature. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…A similar trend was observed from S22, S9, S2, S30, S23, S7, S3, S27, and S24 in the same area. It has been stated that environmental variables or differences in pathogen populations may drive the instability or resistance among potato cultivars and clones-resistance in one program may often lead to susceptibility in other breeding programs when they are released [32]. Numerous studies have stated that a rise of soil pH from 4.0 to 7.0 can increase both the number of tubers infected by common scab and the area of tuber surface damage [33][34][35].…”
Section: Potato Common Scab Infected Rate (%) and Potato Common Scab mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precision was measured as relative standard deviation (RSD) using six replicates of the peak area ratio of each sugar to IS for three different concentrations (0.5 µg/mL, 2 µg/mL, and 10 µg/mL). LOD and LOQ were calculated for six replicates of single standard as 3.3/10 times the standard deviation divided by the slope of the calibration curve for each sugar [24,34,38]. The analytical method data for quantification of six sugars is shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%