2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-85760-0_72
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cue Integration for Medical Image Annotation

Abstract: Abstract. This paper presents the algorithms and results of our participation to the image annotation task of ImageCLEFmed 2007. We proposed a multi-cue approach where images are represented both by global and local descriptors. These cues are combined following two SVMbased strategies. The first algorithm, called Discriminative Accumulation Scheme (DAS), trains an SVM for each feature, and considers as output of each classifier the distance from the separating hyperplane. The final decision is taken on a line… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, for deciding upon a dictionary size to be used for a specific application, one should identify the optimum tradeoffs of accuracy and computational efficiency. Even though a higher dictionary size provides better results in most applications on natural image classification1820, the size of a dictionary was found not to be particularly important in a medical image classification task44. Caicedo et al36 also report that their SIFT-based codebook required fewer codeblocks to express all different patterns in the histo-pathological image collection that they have tested, and claim their results to be consistent with the rotation and scale invariance properties of the SIFT descriptor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Therefore, for deciding upon a dictionary size to be used for a specific application, one should identify the optimum tradeoffs of accuracy and computational efficiency. Even though a higher dictionary size provides better results in most applications on natural image classification1820, the size of a dictionary was found not to be particularly important in a medical image classification task44. Caicedo et al36 also report that their SIFT-based codebook required fewer codeblocks to express all different patterns in the histo-pathological image collection that they have tested, and claim their results to be consistent with the rotation and scale invariance properties of the SIFT descriptor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…On top of this, one should remember that the problem presents a high inter-class vs intra-class variability, which also pushes for storing a large percentage of training data as support vectors. For a more detailed discussion of the results, we refer the reader to Tommasi et al (2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to generate a codebook, K ‐means clustering algorithm is used and all the local features are clustered together independently using K = 500. Here K indicates the size of dictionary/codebook, however, codebook size is not significant in medical images [32]. An average of 32,770 vectors was identified for all lesions as well as for normal features to form 500 clusters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%